fund-review

Plugin fund-review from marketplace astra-studio in Ameng2001/astra-studio-plugins. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 6 days ago.

Skills (12)

• baseline-build

  第二层：BOM × 区域标准包 → 区域基准。产出逐条目 UFP/AFP/因子、分系统汇总、条款引用索引与版本锁，供第三层出报价复用；也可直接 diff 两份基准做跨区域分析。触发词："建区域基准", "算这个省值多少钱", "跨区域对比", "diff 基准", "/fund-review:baseline-build"。

• bom-build

  从人工梳理的 xlsx 建设清单构建造价 BOM（唯一事实源 / TOS）—— 区域无关、交付无关的功能点与产品事实。产出 `bom/items/*.yaml` + 构建报告。触发词："构建BOM", "生成造价清单事实源", "导入建设清单", "/fund-review:bom-build"。

• bom-sync-lark

  把造价 BOM 同步到飞书多维表格并把评审结果拉回。三条通道：BOM 共创（地域无关的产品事实，方案人员按子系统分表编辑）、功能点计算书（BOM × 某省标准包渲染的只读送审材料，一省一个 Base）、裁决表（实体核对/占位确认/类型裁决等人在环判断）。触发词："同步BOM到飞书", "推送共创表", "推送计算书", "生成某省计算书", "拉取飞书裁决", "/fund-review:bom-sync-lark"。

• bom-validate

  对造价 BOM 执行质量门禁 G-01..G-14，回答"当前版本能晋升到哪一级、还差什么"。检查功能点类型分布、ILF 缺失、描述可判定性、跨系统重复计列、成熟度举证等。触发词："校验BOM", "BOM质量门禁", "检查功能点拆分", "/fund-review:bom-validate"。

• delivery-plan

  设定 BOM 各条目的交付形态（私有化/SaaS/买断/订阅），展开运营期费用清单与 TCO 对比，并跑一致性规则防重复计列。触发词："交付方式", "私有化还是SaaS", "运营期费用", "TCO对比", "/fund-review:delivery-plan"。

• init-session

  Initialize a fund-review session workspace. Parses the budget standard PDF, quote xlsx files, and optional quote guideline into structured JSON under `.fund-review/{session-id}/`. Called automatically by quote-optimize on first run; can also be invoked directly. Trigger phrases: "初始化报价会话", "解析标准和报价"

• quote-generate

  第三层：区域基准 × 交付方案 × 范围 → 本商机报价。产出建设期采购清单、功能点测算表、运营期清单、TCO 对比、编制说明与版本锁。范围按子系统选、模式从库里挑。触发词："生成报价", "出造价清单", "算一版报价", "只做某几个子系统", "换个交付模式", "/fund-review:quote-generate"。

• quote-optimize

  Analyze a quote against the local budget standard + global pricing guideline and produce a structured list of optimization suggestions. Targets the three known pain points — subject misalignment, platform/LLM semantic overlap, and coarse labor pricing. Outputs `optimize-suggestions.json` and waits f

• quote-review

  Score a quote against the local budget standard from a financial-reviewer perspective. Every conclusion is paired with a citation to the standard (PDF page + section). Use after quote-rewrite (against `quote-final.xlsx`) or directly on the original (`quote.json`) for an initial diagnostic. Trigger p

• quote-rewrite

  Apply an approved optimization plan to the original quote spreadsheets. Modifies subject codes, splits platform/LLM semantics, recomputes labor pricing, restructures sheets, and recomputes all totals. Outputs `quote-final.xlsx` (one per source workbook) plus a changelog. Trigger phrases: "按方案重写报价",

• quote-selfreview

  对自己生成的报价做财评预审（红队预演）—— 预演财评专家会怎么问、检查我方能否作答，产出财评自审报告。条款引证按 pack_id 动态取，不硬编码地方标准。触发词："财评自审", "自己评一遍", "送审前检查", "/fund-review:quote-selfreview"。

• standard-ingest

  把地方财评标准 PDF 摄取为结构化标准包（pack.yaml），每个参数带页码级 citation，并用标准自带算例与既有工作簿双重回归验证。支持多区域并存。触发词："摄取标准", "建标准包", "解析预算标准", "/fund-review:standard-ingest"。

Slash commands (4)

• /fund-review:init

  Initialize a fund-review session — parse the budget standard PDF, quote xlsx, and optional pricing guideline into a structured session workspace.

• /fund-review:optimize

  Scan a quote and produce a list of optimization suggestions with standard citations. Waits for human approval before any rewrite.

• /fund-review:review

  Score a quote against the budget standard from a financial-reviewer perspective; every finding cites a specific clause and page.

• /fund-review:rewrite

  Apply an approved optimization plan — rewrite the quote xlsx with corrected subjects, semantic split, recomputed labor pricing, and restructured sheets.

Subagents (2)

• financial-reviewer

  Pre-audit financial reviewer. Plays the role of a 政府财评专家 reviewing an information-technology procurement quote against the local budget standard. Produces precise, citation-backed challenges — never lets a finding slip without a page reference.

• quote-optimizer

  Expert quote-optimization advisor. Given deterministic scanner findings + the global pricing guideline + a clause index of the budget standard, filters, prioritizes, and explains optimization suggestions. Always cites the specific standard clause and page when justifying a suggestion.

Similar plugins