claude

senior-review

Review of a change, branch, PR, plan or document: focused auditors composed per review, evidenced findings, adversarial verification, coverage gaps.

9 on GitHubby Alfio Caprinov1.0.1MITupdated yesterday
/

Plugin senior-review from marketplace daodan in acaprino/daodan. Commands read from the repo's manifest — yesterday.

What it installs

Skills (7)

  • application-cleanup-method

    Apply accepted application-subtraction findings with isolated phases and snapshot-bound build/test gates. Load from the host cleanup entry point, code-review Step 7c or lifecycle cleanup.

  • defect-taxonomy

    16 macro-categories and 140+ subcategories of source-code failure modes, with CWE and OWASP mappings, fix patterns, and review frameworks. TRIGGER WHEN: an audit needs structured defect classification, a detection strategy, or severity calibration; loaded by code-auditor, security-auditor, and ui-ra

  • investigation-method

    Investigate an observed error, bug or strange behavior to a demonstrated cause, without fixing it: facts, perimeter from the map, isolated hypotheses, a reproduction test, bisection. TRIGGER WHEN: the user reports an error, regression or strange behavior whose cause is unknown and wants it investiga

  • review-consolidation

    Consolidate native review findings with evidence provenance, delivery accounting and adversarial verification. Load when consolidating code-review, team-review or pr-review results.

  • review-method

    Unified review engine: the light review and the branch review (variants team-review and pr-review, and code-review), including signal-selected stack specialists. TRIGGER WHEN: the user asks to review current changes, a commit, a file, a plan, a specification, a document, a branch or a pull request f

  • review-preparation

    Prepare the existing code, team or PR review inputs without writing another detection prompt. Load before dispatching reviewers in senior-review.

  • review-quality-gates

    Verification panel, completeness critic, pipeline conventions and shared-context provenance rules for multi-reviewer consolidation. TRIGGER WHEN: running a branch/team review through the host entry point or code-review quality gates, or consolidating findings from parallel reviewers.

View source on GitHub

More from acaprino/daodan

All 2 plugins →

Inventory, symbols, relationships, modules and semantic descriptions of a repository, served to the agent on demand.

1 skill · 1 MCP server · hooks

9

Maintain senior-review?

This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.

claude & codex plugins2 plugins