Orchestrator that spawns nested sub-agents (up to depth=5) via Claude Code's native Task tool — for deep delegation where context isolation matters more than throughput
nested-leaf
Leaf-worker template for nested spawn trees — performs one focused task and returns a structured summary. Deliberately does NOT have the Task tool (least-privilege boundary)
nested-queen-leaf
Tier-2 leaf — bottom of a queen-led tree. Deliberately no Task tool (least-privilege), but DOES record trajectory steps, AIDefence-scan its own inbound prompt, and report cost — so the queen's intelligence pipeline learns from every leaf outcome
nested-queen-researcher
Tier-2 recursive researcher — nested-researcher's role with HNSW pattern retrieval, AIDefence-gated web content, hive-mind consensus on which followups to pursue, and full trajectory recording
nested-queen-reviewer
Tier-2 recursive reviewer — find-and-verify like nested-reviewer, but with hive-mind byzantine consensus on findings (replaces inline majority voting), AIDefence-screened evidence, and trajectory learning across review runs
nested-queen
Heavyweight nested orchestrator — wires Claude Code's depth=5 nesting onto ruflo's hive-mind, swarm, intelligence pipeline, claims/AuthScope, AIDefence, and cost-budget machinery. Use when depth alone isn't enough.
nested-researcher
Recursive research orchestrator — fans out into sub-research branches when an investigation deepens, keeping each branch in its own context window
nested-reviewer
Recursive review orchestrator — each finding can spawn an adversarial verifier in its own context, so review remains thorough without bloating the top-level reviewer
wasm-specialist
WASM sandbox specialist for creating, managing, and sharing isolated agent environments
A four-tier memory ladder for Claude Code where promotion is earned by recurrence, not asserted by confidence. L0 raw transcripts are never injected; L1 candidate atoms are gitignored and recalled on lexical relevance per prompt; L2 project context loads each session start; L3 stable persona is always loaded. L1 to L2 needs three distinct sessions spanning two distinct calendar days (a stated claim needs two; a verified claim is the only single-observation path); L2 to L3 needs two projects and thirty days. Two gates refuse rather than guess: a claim altered by the redaction pass never promotes on evidence alone, and a contradicted claim freezes until a human resolves it. Three hooks run the loop unattended and every one fails open. Nothing reaches a committed CLAUDE.md without an explicit human adopt. Ships 5 stdlib scripts, 3 hooks, a cs-memory-curator agent, /cs-memory, a JSON schema, and a 69-check validator. Concept from TencentCloud/TencentDB-Agent-Memory (MIT); no upstream code included.
Audit a project's npm, PyPI, and Go dependencies for supply-chain risk: version-matched advisories for direct dependencies and the full lockfile tree, abandoned upstreams, npm publisher concentration, and install scripts
Ships pull requests to open-source projects you don't maintain — CONTRIBUTING compliance, PR-size/scope checks, minimal-diff implementation, AI-disclosure PR descriptions, and rebase or bot-review replies. Use for 提 PR / 上游 PR / 贡献代码, "open a PR", "fix this upstream", "rebase against main", "respond to the bot review". Not for reviewing PRs as maintainer (use github-review-pr) or general GitHub CRUD (use github-ops).
Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), Articles 51-56. Covers GPAI model identification (Art. 3(63)), systemic risk model designation (Art. 3(65), Art. 51, 10^25 FLOP training compute threshold), upstream provider obligations under Art. 53 (transparency, technical documentation, copyright policy, training data summary), additional systemic risk obligations under Art. 55 (model evaluation, adversarial testing, AI Office incident notification, cybersecurity), systemic-risk notification and Commission designation under Art. 52, downstream Art. 25 quasi-provider duties, and Art. 53(2) open-source exemption. Built for in-house counsel and AI governance teams reviewing LLM or foundation model deployments, drafting GPAI compliance plans, or assessing systemic risk thresholds. DACH: BaFin, BSI, BNetzA. Pairs with the EU AI Act System Classifier, High-Risk Readiness, FRIA, and Serious Incident Reporting skills.
Research-augmented fork of obra/superpowers. Ships 13 workflow skills (brainstorming, planning, code review, debugging, verification, worktrees, parallel agents) standalone, with no dependency on the upstream superpowers plugin.
13 skills
jamditis/claude-skills-journalism 452
Maintain ruflo-agent?
This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.