deep-researchRun a multi-source investigation of a research topic and produce a self-contained, cited research brief with a provenance record, using the research:researcher, research:writer and research:verifier agents. Use when the user asks for deep research, a research brief, a thorough multi-source investiga
eli5Explain a research paper, method or technical concept in plain English for a non-specialist, in six fixed sections with one analogy that maps onto the mechanism and an honest section on what to be sceptical of. Use when the user says "ELI5", "explain like I'm five", "explain this paper simply", "in
external-researchLook up current external evidence on the web and in academic sources (arXiv, Semantic Scholar, GitHub, official documentation) and answer in the conversation with a URL for every claim. Use when the user asks about a recent release, the current state of a model, library, benchmark or price, "what's
literature-reviewSurvey the academic literature on a research question and produce a thematic literature review with results tables, notation, consensus, disagreements, trends and open questions, using the research:researcher, research:writer and research:verifier agents. Use when the user asks for a literature revi
paper-code-auditAudit a research paper's claims against its code repository: clones the repository, maps every method, hyperparameter, metric and data-handling claim to file:line evidence, and classifies mismatches, omissions and reproducibility risks by severity. Use when the user asks to audit a paper against its
paper-draftTurn research findings, notes or evidence into a paper-style draft with sections, equations and explicitly scoped claims, in Markdown (the research brief format) or LaTeX (a project template or the bundled article template), using the research:writer and research:verifier agents. Use when the user a
peer-reviewWrite a severity-graded peer review (FATAL, MAJOR, MINOR) of a research paper, preprint, draft or research brief, with quoted passages, questions for the authors, a verdict and a revision plan, using the research:reviewer agent. Use when the user asks to peer review a paper, says "what would reviewe
source-comparisonCompare named papers, methods, models, libraries or frameworks against each other from external sources and produce a cited comparison matrix with a confidence label per cell, separating agreement, disagreement and gaps, using the research:researcher, research:writer and research:verifier agents. Us
tldrCondense a finished research brief into a short TL;DR in the conversation: the bottom line, the findings that carry it, how far to trust it and what is still open, taken only from the brief and its provenance record. Use after research:deep-research, or when the user says "tldr", "tl;dr", "summarise