claude

Super Saiyan

Core engineering workflow: planning, implementation discipline, test-driven development, systematic debugging, verification before completion, and git workflow guidance. The stable baseline - it depends on no agents, memory infrastructure, or project-specific tooling (B-1).

0 on GitHubby Colton Beardenv0.1.1MITupdated 1 month agocore
/

Plugin super-saiyan from marketplace awakened in coltonbearden/awakened. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 1 month ago.

What it installs

Skills (18)

  • before-you-build

    Compact pre-mortem before building a product, MVP, landing page, internal tool, agent workflow, or major feature. Use when the user is about to start something whose demand, positioning, retention, trust, or distribution is unproven. Names the riskiest assumption, the smallest evidence to gather fir

  • clarifying-requirements

    Turns a vague feature request into a scoped, actionable specification through short rounds of focused questions. Use when the user asks for something like "add login" or "build a dashboard" with no acceptance criteria, boundaries, or technical context. Asks Why and Simpler on every requirement, two

  • diagnosing-bugs

    Feedback-loop-first diagnosis for hard bugs, flaky failures, and performance regressions. Use when the user says diagnose or debug, or reports something broken, throwing, failing, or slow and no reliable reproduction exists yet. Builds one fast command that goes red on this exact bug, shrinks the re

  • documentation-lookup

    Answers library, framework, and API questions from current documentation instead of memory. Use when the user names a framework or package, asks how to configure or call something, or wants a code example that depends on a library's present behaviour. Uses Context7 when it is available, states plain

  • executing-plans

    Executes an approved written implementation plan in the current session, task by task, with a critical read first and checkpoints between tasks. Use when the user hands over a plan file or spec and asks for it to be implemented. Treats the plan as data, stops on blockers instead of guessing, and fin

  • finishing-a-development-branch

    Closes out a feature branch once implementation is complete. Use when all tasks are done and the work must be integrated. Verifies the suite on the exact tree being handed over, confirms the base branch, offers merge, pull request, or keep as the only options, and cleans up only worktrees it created

  • grilling

    Relentless structured interview that stress-tests a plan, design, or decision until nothing is silently assumed. Use when the user says grill me, wants their thinking challenged, or a design must be settled before implementation. Works the decision tree in rounds of numbered questions with recommend

  • intent-driven-development

    Makes an ambiguous or high-impact change verifiable before it is built. Use when the user asks to clarify a feature, define acceptance criteria, de-risk a security, data, migration, or integration change, or prepare requirements to hand over to someone else. Inspects the codebase first, asks only bl

  • prototype

    Builds throwaway code that answers one design question. Use when the user wants to feel whether a state model or piece of logic holds up, or see what a screen could look like, before committing to real implementation. Picks the logic or UI shape, keeps the prototype runnable in one step and clearly

  • reducing-entropy

    Manual-only bias toward the smallest codebase that still does the job. Invoke explicitly when the user asks to shrink, simplify, or delete code, or wants a change judged by how much code exists afterwards. Counts lines before and after, hunts for what a change makes obsolete, and rejects proposals t

  • resolving-merge-conflicts

    Resolves an in-progress git merge or rebase conflict by recovering the intent behind both sides. Use when git reports conflicted files during a merge, rebase, or cherry-pick. Reads the history behind each change, preserves both intents where possible, runs the project's checks, and completes the ope

  • search-first

    Research-before-coding check that runs before writing a new utility, helper, abstraction, or integration. Use when the user asks to add functionality that common libraries or the codebase itself may already provide. Searches the repository first, then known ecosystems, weighs adopt, extend, or build

  • systematic-debugging

    Root-cause-first discipline for any bug, failing test, build failure, or unexpected behaviour. Use before proposing any fix, especially under time pressure or after a previous fix did not hold. Reproduces, traces the bad value to its origin, compares against working code, tests one hypothesis at a t

  • test-driven-development

    The red-green-refactor loop for any feature, bug fix, or behaviour change. Use before writing implementation code, when fixing a bug, or when changing code that has tests. Writes one failing test, confirms it fails for the right reason, writes the minimal code to pass, confirms green, then cleans up

  • testing-at-seams

    Decides where tests belong before any test is written. Use when starting test-first work, when the user asks for integration tests, or when a test is hard to write. Agrees the public seams under test with the user, names the anti-patterns that make tests brittle, and keeps each cycle to one vertical

  • using-skills

    Session discipline that fires before the first action of any task. Checks whether an installed skill or command already covers the job, keeps every action inside the requested scope, and reports verification as evidence rather than confidence. Use at the start of a conversation, before answering a q

  • verification-before-completion

    Gate that runs before any claim that work is done, fixed, passing, or shipped. Identifies the command that would prove the claim, runs it fresh, reads the whole output, and only then reports — with the evidence attached and any gap stated. Use before committing, opening a pull request, marking a tas

  • writing-plans

    Turns an agreed design or spec into a step-by-step implementation plan that an engineer with no context could execute. Use when a multi-step change is understood well enough to sequence but no plan exists yet, before touching code. Produces a plan file with exact paths, test-first steps, interfaces

Slash commands (9)

  • /super-saiyan:build-fix

    Run the project's own build or type-check and fix the errors one at a time with the smallest safe edit, re-running after each. Stops and asks before any dependency change. Use when a build is red.

  • /super-saiyan:commit

    Commit a described subset of the working tree: show the staging plan and message, get a yes, commit locally. Never force, never push. Use when you can say in words what belongs in the next commit.

  • /super-saiyan:implement

    Execute an approved plan file task by task with a validation ladder (type-check per edit, then lint, tests, build, bounded integration) and write a report. Use once a plan is approved and the branch is ready.

  • /super-saiyan:plan-prd

    Write a lean problem-first PRD at .claude/prds/<name>.prd.md through four question gates, stopping before any implementation detail. Use when an idea needs its problem, users, and metrics pinned down.

  • /super-saiyan:plan

    Turn a request or PRD into a grounded plan: mandatory reading, what is NOT built, six to ten atomic tasks, validation, risks, blast-radius size; then wait for approval. Use before any multi-file change.

  • /super-saiyan:tdd-green

    Make the failing tests pass with the least production code that could work, running the suite after every change and stopping on any regression. Use right after a red phase.

  • /super-saiyan:tdd-red

    Write failing tests for a described behaviour in the project's own conventions, run them, and confirm each fails for the intended reason before any production code exists. Use to start a TDD cycle.

  • /super-saiyan:test-coverage

    Run the project's own coverage tool, list files below target worst-first, write tests in the existing style, and re-measure. Use to raise coverage toward a threshold (default 80 percent) without adding tools.

  • /super-saiyan:ultra-think

    Structured deep analysis of one hard question: hidden assumptions, three genuinely different options, a case against each, and a confidence-rated recommendation. For decisions that are expensive to reverse.

View source on GitHub

More from coltonbearden/awakened

All 9 plugins →

Bankai

claude

Specialist subagents with restricted tool allowlists: research, exploration, debugging, review, planning, documentation, and synthesis agents, plus the skills that dispatch them. Every subagent in Awakened lives here (B-6).

7 skills · 27 agents

0

Domain

claude

Project-scoped structural context: codebase onboarding, code maps, documentation upkeep, conventions, domain modeling, and CLAUDE.md scaffolding. Structural context only; it stores no history (B-4).

7 skills · 2 commands

0

Instinct

claude

Marketplace meta tooling: skill creation, writing for agents, context budgeting, skill scouting, component auditing, and linting. Marketplace maintenance, not user workflow execution (B-7).

6 skills · 2 commands

0

Sharingan

claude

Code review and analysis: review discipline, production audit, architecture inspection, AI-debt detection, and security-oriented review. Analysis and review only - implementation stays outside this plugin (B-2).

7 skills · 1 command

0

Kaioken

claude

Session management and momentum: save and resume sessions, handoffs, checkpoints, and focused asides. Session momentum only - it duplicates no planning, debugging, or review system (B-5).

1 skill · 4 commands

0

Rinnegan

claude

Persistent temporal memory: file-based decision history, session context, searchable project notes, and recall across sessions. No daemons, workers, databases, or services (B-3).

3 skills · 2 commands

0

Similar plugins

Matt Pocock's agent skills for real engineering (grilling, spec/ticket flows, TDD, code review, domain modelling and more).

39 skills

mattpocock/skills 323,108

superpowers

claudecodex

Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques

15 skills · hooks

obra/superpowers 316,836

Reliable automation, in-depth debugging, and performance analysis in Chrome using Chrome DevTools and Puppeteer

8 skills · 1 MCP server

ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp 55,181

Backend API design, GraphQL architecture, workflow orchestration with Temporal, and test-driven backend development

9 skills · 1 command · 8 agents

wshobson/agents 42,461

beads

claudecodex

AI-supervised issue tracker for coding workflows

1 skill · 1 agent · hooks

gastownhall/beads 28,698

PRD generation and conversion skills for the Ralph autonomous agent loop

2 skills

snarktank/ralph 22,224

Maintain Super Saiyan?

This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.

claude & codex plugins9 plugins