adversaria

Plugin adversaria from marketplace damionrashford-adversaria in damionrashford/Adversaria. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 1 month ago.

Skills (5)

• appeal

  Review a standing verdict as a second panel, admitting new counters and evidence the first pass missed, then re-run and report what changed. Use when the user disputes a verdict, says it was too harsh or too generous, asks to appeal, asks for a second opinion on an analysis, or says the judge got it

• crucible

  Stress-test any idea, proposal, or plan by finding its weakest points, probing hidden assumptions with Socratic questions, and identifying failure modes through red team analysis. Use when the user asks to stress-test, poke holes, find weaknesses, red team, challenge, or ask 'what could go wrong' or

• devils-advocate

  Full adversarial analysis of any idea, proposal, or argument. Runs steelman, crucible, and verdict in sequence for a complete challenge drawing from 10 reasoning traditions. Use when the user asks to play devil's advocate, run a full challenge, or says 'tear this apart' or 'give me the full treatmen

• steelman

  Build the strongest possible version of an argument, then argue the complete opposite with equal conviction. Use when the user asks to steelman something, argue both sides, make the strongest case, or understand the best version of an opposing view.

• verdict

  Deliver a structured verdict on any idea, argument, or proposal, identifying what survives scrutiny, what doesn't, and what needs more work. Includes the gadfly sting, the one uncomfortable truth nobody wants to say. Use when the user asks for a verdict, bottom line, final assessment, 'what survives

Subagents (3)

• adversary

  Finds every weakness, flaw, and failure mode in an idea. Authentic dissenter, not assigned devil's advocacy. Use proactively when stress-testing, red teaming, poking holes, or when the user asks what could go wrong, what they're missing, or to challenge something. - adversaria:crucible

• advocate

  Builds the strongest possible case for an idea with genuine conviction. Not neutral analysis, authentic advocacy. Use proactively when the user asks to steelman, make the best case, argue both sides, or defend an idea. - adversaria:steelman

• judge

  Renders dispassionate structured verdict from argument graph evidence. No advocacy in either direction. Use after advocate and adversary have contributed to the graph, or standalone when the user asks for a verdict, bottom line, or final assessment. - adversaria:verdict

Hooks (5)

• SessionStart

  command -v bun >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit 0; bun "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/session-restore.ts"

• PreToolUse

  command -v bun >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit 0; bun "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/graph-validate.ts"

• PostToolUse

  command -v bun >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit 0; bun "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/auto-analyze.ts"

• PostToolUse

  command -v bun >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit 0; bun "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/agent-summary.ts"

• Stop

  command -v bun >/dev/null 2>&1 || exit 0; bun "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/hooks/scripts/session-save.ts"

Similar plugins