cowrite

Plugin cowrite from marketplace cowriting in dozwa/claude-cowriting. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 8 days ago.

Skills (20)

• annotate

  Annotate AI log entries: was the AI input adopted, adapted, rejected or just information, and for which chapter. Use after receiving help, or when the pane shows unannotated turns.

• ask

  Ask one persona a question directly.

• brief

  Tell a persona what to look for in this project; without text it interviews you.

• consistency

  Consistency report on the manuscript: terminology, abbreviations, cross-references, citekeys, figure/table numbering. Reports only. Use before sharing a draft.

• disclosure

  Generate the AI-use disclosure (KI-Verzeichnis / AI register) for the paper from the AI log, in English or German, as Markdown or LaTeX. Use before submission or when the author needs to declare AI use.

• explain

  Explain a concept, method or theory for the author's understanding, and add it to an AI glossary. Use when the author wants to understand something, not to have it written.

• feedback

  Located, non-directive feedback on a section of the author's manuscript: strengths, problems, guiding questions. Never rewrites. Use when the author asks for feedback on their text.

• init

  Set up a CoWriting paper workspace (LaTeX or Markdown, EN/DE) with manuscript, literature, AI log, disclosure and VS Code settings. Use when starting a new thesis, article or report.

• language

  Grammar, spelling and punctuation check (EN/DE) with corrected forms and the rule behind each correction. Use when the author asks for proofreading of their text.

• pane

  Open the CoWriting pane: review party, open feedback to read, classify, reply to and have a persona remember, live hints, AI log, scope, progress.

• paper

  Open a paper by path from any folder, pick a recent one by number, or switch between the projects in the folder. Without arguments it lists recent papers. `upgrade` shows what a workspace from an earlier plugin version lacks, `upgrade apply` adds it.

• party

  Compose the review party of this paper: list, add or remove catalogue personas, or create an expert of your own.

• quiet

  How much of Claude Code's own work the transcript shows: off, calm or focus.

• scope

  The paper's scope and progress against it: goal, points to make, words or pages, figures, tables, references, sections, deadline. Alone it shows the progress; check asks a small model which points the text already makes; edit sets the scope with you.

• socratic

  Socratic dialogue that helps the author think through a section before or while writing it. Asks questions, one at a time; gives no text. Use when the author is stuck or planning a section.

• sources

  Literature help: search papers, check the author's Zotero library and Obsidian notes, verify DOIs, write marked source notes. Use when the author needs sources or wants citations checked.

• structure

  Structure and argument check of the author's text: reverse outline, argument map, red thread, gaps. Use when the author wants to see how their text is built.

• submit

  Pre-submission run of the whole paper, as one checklist. The Integrity Guardian's check, the consistency report, open markers and unverified references, the AI log's open turns and whether the disclosure is current. Use when a draft is about to leave the house (supervisor, co-authors, journal, exami

• summon

  Ask one persona of the review party for a review.

• watch

  Live review while you write: short hints from the watching personas when you pause.

Subagents (10)

• architect

  Structure and argumentation: outline, red thread, paragraph logic, transitions, claim-evidence chains. Use when the author wants feedback on how their text is built.

• clinician

  Clinical perspective: clinical relevance, patient outcomes, applicability, safety and ethics. Use for medical and health research texts.

• grammar-guy

  Language reviewer for grammar, spelling, punctuation and typography in English and German academic texts. Use when the author wants language corrections of their manuscript.

• integrity-guardian

  Research integrity check following DFG good scientific practice: plagiarism closeness, citation and quotation correctness, AI disclosure gaps, authorship and data issues. Use before submission or when unsure about integrity questions.

• lay-reader

  Reader without expertise: clarity, jargon, abbreviations, accessibility of abstract and introduction. Use when the author wants to know whether non-experts can follow the text.

• librarian

  Literature and sources: coverage of the field, citation accuracy, Zotero library, Obsidian notes, DOI verification. Use when the author needs to find, check or organize sources.

• reviewer-2

  Critical peer-review simulation: weaknesses, limitations, missing alternatives and overclaims. Use when the author wants a tough but fair review before submission.

• statistics-nerd

  Methods and statistics reviewer: study design, analyses, effect sizes, uncertainty, reporting guidelines. Use when the author wants feedback on methods, results or figures.

• style-coach

  Writing-style coach: compares the author's style with model papers the author likes (literature/style-models/) and gives hints on sentence rhythm, voice, hedging, signposting and paragraph moves. Use when the author wants their text to read more like the papers they admire.

• terminologist

  Field terminology reviewer: checks whether the author uses the established terms of their research field, flags unusual, outdated, colloquial or inconsistent wording, and asks for a definition where the author deliberately deviates. Use when the author wants to know if their wording is what the fiel

Similar plugins