claudecodex

ai-psychiatry

Semantic anti-bypass and sufficient-reasoning controls for coding agents.

13 on GitHubby Ihab Khaledv0.7.0MITupdated 1 month agoProductivity
/

Plugin ai-psychiatry from marketplace ihabkhaled-ai in ihabkhaled/AI-Psychiatry. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 12 days ago.

This plugin runs code on your machine — its hooks fire automatically on events like tool use. The exact commands are listed below; read them before installing.

What it installs

Skills (49)

  • all-the-medicine

    Use when the user explicitly requests the complete AI-Psychiatry framework through one all-in-one command that evaluates and orchestrates every available skill until the task is proven complete.

  • anti-gaming

    Use when commands, labels, agents, counters, or classifications change while the same underlying behavior continues.

  • anti-overthinking

    Use when analysis paralysis, speculative branching, repeated replanning, premature architecture work, or indecision blocks a reversible implementation or test.

  • attention-reset

    Use when objective switching, novelty chasing, repeated context switching, optional branches, or ADHD-like distraction as a behavioral analogy interrupts delivery.

  • blocker-validator

    Use when BLOCKED is proposed after difficulty, uncertainty, unfamiliar code, a slow operation, or a small number of failed attempts.

  • bounded-investigation

    Use when debugging, architecture inspection, research, or repository exploration risks becoming open-ended, recursive, speculative, or disconnected from a decision.

  • completion-evidence

    Use when DONE is proposed with unrun tests, missing requirements, inferred success, happy-path-only proof, or unresolved required findings.

  • completion-gate

    Use when requested behavior appears complete, remaining work is optional, perfectionism delays delivery, or the agent continues auditing, refining, testing, or researching after proof.

  • context-balance

    Use when context is overloaded or compression may have removed requirements, constraints, evidence, blockers, or decisions.

  • context-compression

    Use when a long session, large tool output, repeated discussion, or handoff needs a compact state that preserves decisions and enables continuation.

  • context-refresh

    Use when active context is large, stale, contradictory, repeatedly reread, or no longer represents current source and task state.

  • context-router

    Use when choosing which repository instructions, architecture, domain knowledge, files, tests, or deep guidance to load for a task without reading everything.

  • critic-controller

    Use when reviewers or judges repeat rounds, invent requirements, block on style, expand scope, or continue after correctness, security, regression, and explicit requirements are satisfied.

  • deadlock-recovery

    Use when no productive next action can be selected because dependencies, authority, contradictory constraints, missing access, or unresolved evidence block progress.

  • decision-readiness

    Use when an important implementation, architecture, security, data, or delivery decision rests on unresolved critical unknowns.

  • direct-communication

    Use when answers, progress updates, explanations, or questions risk verbosity, repetition, indirect wording, vague conclusions, or conversational loops.

  • evidence-floor

    Use when mandatory behavior, integration, security, migration, or data requirements lack the appropriate kind of proof.

  • evidence-gate

    Use when files, services, commands, tests, APIs, configuration, architecture, publication, or runtime results are assumed without an authoritative repository or tool source.

  • executive-function

    Use when a task needs explicit control of objective, scope, priority, nesting, retries, verification, progress, drift, recovery, or termination.

  • executive-override

    Use when an AI-Psychiatry budget expires while new evidence shows a narrow extension is required for correctness, security, or completion.

  • failure-learning

    Use after a non-trivial, recurring, or expensive failure when a concise evidenced lesson could prevent future repeated investigation.

  • false-progress-detector

    Use when status reports emphasize tools, files, commits, plans, tokens, or agents while requirements and evidence remain unchanged.

  • framework-red-team

    Use when an agent-control framework needs adversarial testing for fake productivity, loops, recursion, evidence gaps, or vague wording.

  • goal-lock

    Use when the requested outcome is unclear, silently changing, being reinterpreted by discoveries, or disconnected from the active implementation.

  • handoff-task

    Use when work moves to another agent, session, person, or environment and the recipient needs enough state to continue without a sprawling narrative.

  • hidden-recursion-detector

    Use when nested work is renamed, moved across agents, promoted to top level, or hidden behind research, validation, review, and dependency labels.

  • investigation-floor

    Use when non-trivial implementation starts before what exists, what changes, why, risks, and validation are sufficiently known.

  • knowledge-maintainer

    Use when repository architecture, rules, skills, commands, context routing, manifests, or generated AI knowledge change and dependent sources may become stale.

  • livelock-recovery

    Use when activity is high but requirements, blockers, tests, and deliverables remain unchanged across repeated edit, search, test, review, or planning cycles.

  • loop-detector

    Use when commands, searches, file reads, edits, tests, critics, plans, context reloads, or strategies repeat without new evidence or acceptance progress.

  • loophole-hunter

    Use when rules appear satisfied while their intent is bypassed, counters reset, classifications change conveniently, or an AI-Psychiatry audit is requested.

  • memory-curator

    Use when deciding whether task discoveries, decisions, preferences, architecture, failures, or lessons deserve durable repository memory.

  • memory-validator

    Use when durable memory may contain assumptions, stale facts, contradictions, duplicates, obsolete decisions, or temporary debugging state.

  • multi-agent-coordinator

    Use when two or more agents work concurrently, delegation may recurse, responsibilities overlap, dependencies can deadlock, or a coordinator must preserve scope and termination.

  • never-stop

    Use when the user explicitly requests maximum autonomous execution, no unnecessary questions, persistent recovery, independent decision-making, and continuous work until the full Definition of Done is proven.

  • progress-audit

    Use when status is unclear, activity is high, completion estimates feel unreliable, or the agent may be mistaking reading, reasoning, tools, or churn for progress.

  • reasoning-balance

    Use when a task may be underthinking, sufficiently reasoned, or overthinking and the correct next action is unclear.

  • repository-map-update

    Use when packages, services, ownership boundaries, entrypoints, tests, commands, or dependencies changed and the compact repository map needs a focused update.

  • resume-task

    Use when continuing work from saved task state, a compacted session, a handoff, or a new agent without rereading the entire repository.

  • root-cause-validator

    Use when debugging changes assertions, mocks, exceptions, or symptoms without explaining materially important failure behavior.

  • rule-conflict-resolver

    Use when system, user, repository, domain, AI-Psychiatry, skill, memory, or task-state instructions appear incompatible.

  • scope-guard

    Use when newly discovered work, technical debt, refactors, audits, optimizations, or reviewer suggestions threaten to expand the user-authorized task.

  • scope-laundering-detector

    Use when adjacent work is called required without dependency proof, or inconvenient required work is marked optional.

  • strategy-laundering-detector

    Use when different commands, tools, runners, plans, or agents repeat the same hypothesis and evidence target.

  • strategy-reset

    Use when three same-strategy attempts fail, two approaches oscillate without evidence, or the current abstraction and evidence source cannot resolve the blocker.

  • targeted-testing

    Use when selecting development and final validation commands so evidence is sufficient without repeatedly running expensive or irrelevant suites.

  • task-bootstrap

    Use when beginning any plan, audit, investigation, modification, review, test, or expensive tool action before the primary objective and completion conditions are explicit.

  • underthinking-detector

    Use when implementation, parking, blocking, strategy switching, or completion happens before critical understanding and evidence exist.

  • verification-controller

    Use when deciding what evidence is required, whether previous proof remains valid, or whether repeated testing has become reassurance rather than necessary verification.

Hooks (2)

  • SessionStart

    sh

  • UserPromptSubmit

    sh

View source on GitHub claw-ai.co

Similar plugins

Matt Pocock's agent skills for real engineering (grilling, spec/ticket flows, TDD, code review, domain modelling and more).

39 skills

mattpocock/skills 323,108

superpowers

claudecodex

Core skills library for Claude Code: TDD, debugging, collaboration patterns, and proven techniques

15 skills · hooks

obra/superpowers 316,836

caveman

claude

Talk like caveman. Cut filler. Keep technical details explicit.

22 skills · 1 command · 3 agents · hooks

JuliusBrussee/caveman 119,462

claude-mem

claudecodex

Persistent memory for Claude Code: the next session starts where the last one left off.

29 skills · 1 MCP server · hooks

thedotmack/claude-mem 116,618

Taste Skill

claudecodex

tasteskill 2.5.1: professional company websites at the figma.com and x.ai level, with one section per screen, real photographs, real product UI, effects kept for tech and gaming pages, and a real-browser checker and finish gate.

1 skill

Leonxlnx/taste-skill 114,391

career-ops

claudecodex

Open-source AI job search that runs locally in your AI coding CLI: scan job portals, evaluate listings into a structured A-H report with a 1-5 score, tailor your CV, track applications

5 skills · hooks

career-ops-hq/career-ops 82,253

Maintain ai-psychiatry?

This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.

claude & codex pluginslisted