my-council

Plugin my-council from marketplace claude-plugins in jcconsult/claude-plugins. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 1 month ago.

Skills (3)

• add-persona

  Guided creation of a new my-council persona via a step-by-step interview. Collects the persona's name, description, lens, load-bearing question, and methodology anchor, then writes a complete persona file to ~/.claude/agents/<name>.md following the bundled-persona template. Use to extend the council

• help

  In-chat usage tour for the my-council plugin. Shows the three commands (/my-council, /my-council:add-persona, /my-council:help), the four named panels, the eight bundled personas, environment variables, and a couple of quick-start examples. Use when the operator types /my-council:help, asks "how do

• my-council

  Parallel-critic + separate-synthesis review primitive with a generic persona library for business ideas, research, decisions, and general knowledge-work review. Dispatches a panel of persona agents (skeptic, pragmatist, strategist, customer-voice, operator by default; or business-idea / research / d

Subagents (8)

• customer-voice

  Receiving-end critic. Reads as the person who has to act on, use, or pay for what the input describes. Cuts through internal jargon and unstated assumptions.

• ethicist

  Stakeholder-harm critic. Asks who is harmed or excluded by this and whether that is defensible to a reasonable third party. Rights-and-harms framing, not utilitarian-only.

• futurist

  Forward-aging critic. Asks what changes in the next 1-3 years that makes this look smart or look dumb. Technology drift, regulatory trajectory, deprecation horizons.

• operator

  Pre-mortem critic. Asks how this fails in practice 6 months from now and what the on-call burden looks like in the meantime. Operational reality, not theoretical possibility.

• pragmatist

  Realism critic. Asks what it would actually take to ship this and whether the cost is justified by the benefit. Innovation-token accounting, no aspirational thinking.

• researcher

  Epistemic-rigor critic. Interrogates the evidence base, source quality, methodology, and what would change the author's mind. The voice that says "show me the data".

• skeptic

  Devil's-advocate critic. Challenges premises, finds gaps, asks what would have to be true for this to be wrong. Calibrated dissent, not contrarianism for sport.

• strategist

  Second-order-effects critic. Asks what this opens or closes in 18 months and what our future self thanks us for now. Positioning, optionality, path-dependence.

Similar plugins