enitrat-skill-issue

Plugin enitrat-skill-issue from marketplace cascade-code-testing-misc in joshuarweaver/cascade-code-testing-misc. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 1 month ago.

Skills (82)

• animate-expo

  Build animations in React Native and Expo, making the decisions in the order that determines whether they feel right — should it animate, which thread it runs on, which properties, spring or timing, how the gesture hands off, how it degrades. Writes the implementation with Reanimated, Gesture Handle

• animate

  Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something,

• animation-vocabulary

  Reverse-lookup glossary that turns a vague description of a web animation or motion effect into its exact term ("the bouncy thing when a popover opens" → Pop in; "the iOS rubber-band scroll" → Rubber-banding). Use when the user asks "what's it called when…", or describes a motion effect without know

• apple-design

  Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking,

• ask-sonner

  Guide to Sonner, the React toast library — install and wire up the Toaster, pick the right toast() call, promise and loading toasts, updating, dismissing and persisting toasts, styling, theming and icons, positioning and multiple toasters. Use when working with Sonner or troubleshooting it — toasts

• emil-design-eng

  This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

• find-animation-opportunities

  Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animat

• improve-animations

  Survey a codebase's animation and motion code as a senior motion advisor, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when the user asks to "imp

• mobile-native

  Make a web app feel native on a phone — the small CSS and meta-tag fixes that separate "a website in a browser" from something that feels installed. Covers sticky hover states, tap highlight flashes, the 100vh bug, inputs that zoom the page, laggy taps, pull-to-refresh hijacking scroll, content unde

• pick-ui-library

  Pick the right library for a given frontend task from a curated, opinionated list — numbers, OTP inputs, charts, command menus, virtualization, drag and drop, toasts, state, styling, and more. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.

• prototype

  Build multiple genuinely different versions of a UI piece you describe, rendered behind a visual picker so you can flip through them live and promote the one that feels right. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.

• review-animations

  Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

• write-swift

  How to write modern Swift well — modeling with value types, Swift 6 data-race safety and approachable concurrency (@concurrent, main-actor-by-default, actors, task groups), protocols and generics (some vs any), API design, performance and ARC, Swift Testing, macros, and the modern language features

• architect

  Sketch types, signatures, and module structure before code, then stay in the loop while implementation fills in. Use for /architect, 'architect this', 'design this', or non-trivial work where jumping to code would lock in the wrong shape.

• arena

  Spawn N parallel candidates at the same task, pick a base, graft the strongest parts of the losers into it. Use for /arena, 'arena this', 'throw it in the arena', or when one attempt at a non-trivial artifact would lock in the wrong shape.

• automate-me

  Use for \"automate me\", \"create/update/refresh my -mode skill\", \"turn/capture my preferences or working style into a skill\", or wanting agents to follow how the user works. Drafts or revises a personal -mode skill via create-skill + unslop, optionally pulling fresh evidence from recent transcri

• blast-radius

  Find what a change could break somewhere else before it ships, beyond the diff, and prove the one fact it's safe because of by running real code instead of writing it up. Use for 'blast radius of X', 'what could this break', or reviewing a small diff you don't trust.

• bro

  Restate the last message in plain human language, with no jargon.

• create-verification-skill

  Generate a project-local verification skill that drives your app the way a user does — any language, framework, or platform. Use for /create-verification-skill, \"make a control skill for this repo\", or when a project has no scripted way to prove UI/CLI/service behavior.

• figure-it-out

  Design an auditable playbook when no narrower one fits: a large migration, an ambitious multi-part change, or work a human reviews after stepping away. Scales rigor to the task, runs a hypothesis loop, and logs decisions via show-me-your-work. Use for /figure-it-out, 'figure it out', a large migrati

• how

  Use for \"how does X work\", code walkthroughs before changing something, and placement / ownership / layering questions (\"where should this live\", \"which package owns this\", \"is this the right layer\"). Explains subsystem architecture, runtime flow, onboarding mental models. Use why for motiva

• interrogate

  Use for \"interrogate\", \"adversarial review\", \"multi-model review\", \"challenge this\", \"stress test this code\", \"find blind spots\", or \"tear this apart\". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.

• maintain-verification-skill

  Periodic pass that keeps a project's verification skill and feature map honest: parallel source readers per feature, one live session driving every feature, at most one PR of proven corrections. Use for /maintain-verification-skill or \"audit the verify skill\".

• no-comments

  Spawn Comment Sicko, fix accepted findings, and offer encodings for claimed constraints.

• Poteto Mode

  poteto's agent style for concise, detailed responses, deliberate subagents, unslopped prose, simple code, and verified work. Use for poteto, /poteto-mode, or requests to work in this style.

• principle-attack-the-premise

  Apply when two or more fixes that share one premise have failed the same gate. Take a census of which actors hold the imbalance before the next fix, then question the premise instead of writing another fix that assumes it.

• principle-boundary-discipline

  Apply when wiring validation, error handling, or framework adapters. Concentrate guards at system boundaries (CLI, config, network, external APIs); trust internal types and keep business logic in pure functions.

• principle-build-the-lever

  Apply to any non-trivial work, not just bulk work: edits, migrations, analyses, checks. Build the tool that does it or proves it (codemod, script, generator, or a skill your subagents follow) instead of working by hand. The tool is the artifact a reviewer can rerun.

• principle-encode-lessons-in-structure

  Apply when you catch yourself writing the same instruction a second time, or notice a recurring correction. Encode the rule as a lint, metadata flag, runtime check, or script instead of more text.

• principle-exhaust-the-design-space

  Apply when facing a novel UI interaction or architectural decision with no precedent in the codebase. Build 2-3 competing prototypes and compare side by side before committing.

• principle-experience-first

  Apply when product, UX, or feature-scope tradeoffs come up. Choose user delight over implementation convenience; ship fewer polished features over more rough ones.

• principle-fix-root-causes

  Apply when debugging. Trace each symptom to its root cause and fix it there; reproduce first, ask why until you reach it, resist nil-check guards that silence crashes.

• principle-foundational-thinking

  Apply before writing logic: choosing core types and data structures, sequencing scaffold-vs-feature work, asking what concurrent actors share. Get the data structures right so downstream code becomes obvious.

• principle-guard-the-context-window

  Apply when context is filling up: large outputs, long files, repeated reads, fan-out planning. Route bulk to subagents; keep summaries in the main thread, not raw payloads.

• principle-laziness-protocol

  Apply when refactoring, evaluating diff size, or tempted to add abstractions, layers, or signal threading. Bias toward deletion and the smallest change that solves the problem.

• principle-make-operations-idempotent

  Apply when designing commands, lifecycle steps, or processing loops that run amid crashes, restarts, and retries. Converge to the same end state regardless of partial prior runs.

• principle-migrate-callers-then-delete-legacy-apis

  Apply when introducing a new internal API while old callers still exist. Migrate callers and delete the old API in the same wave instead of preserving compatibility layers.

• principle-minimize-reader-load

  Apply when reviewing or shaping code that's hard to trace. Count layers between question and answer, and hidden state in the reader's head; collapse one-caller wrappers and shrink mutable scope.

• principle-model-the-domain

  Apply when writing stateful logic, or when code branches a lot or repeats a shape assumption across files. Encode the domain in a structure instead of scattered conditionals.

• principle-never-block-on-the-human

  Apply when tempted to ask 'should I do X?' on reversible work. Proceed, present the result, let the human course-correct after the fact; reserve confirmation for irreversible actions.

• principle-outcome-oriented-execution

  Apply during planned rewrites and migrations with explicit phase boundaries. Converge on the target architecture; don't preserve smooth intermediate states with throwaway compatibility code.

• principle-prove-it-works

  Apply after completing a task, before declaring done. Verify against the real artifact (run the feature, read the actual value, inspect the diff), not a proxy, self-report, or 'it compiles.'

• principle-redesign-from-first-principles

  Apply when integrating a new requirement into an existing design. Redesign as if the requirement had been a foundational assumption from day one, instead of bolting it on.

• principle-separate-before-serializing-shared-state

  Apply when concurrent actors might write to the same file, branch, key, or state object. Eliminate the sharing first; serialize structurally only when one shared writer is a real invariant.

• principle-sequence-verifiable-units

  Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a reviewer.

• principle-subtract-before-you-add

  Apply when sequencing an addition, refactor, or rewrite. Remove dead code, redundant validators, and stub references first, then build on the simpler base.

• principle-test-behavior-not-implementation

  Apply when you write, change, or keep a test. Call the code the way its users do and assert the result they observe against a literal expected value. If the test would still pass when every imported function returns undefined, rewrite the assertion or delete the test.

• principle-type-system-discipline

  Apply when designing types, reviewing a function signature, or writing code in any statically-typed language. Make illegal states unrepresentable, brand semantic primitives, parse external data at boundaries, refuse to lie to the compiler, exhaust variants, derive from authoritative schemas.

• recall

  Reconstruct your recent working context from your own chat history, live state, and the shared record (user reports, prior fixes, incidents), then hand back a tight current-state brief. Use for 'recall my work on X', 'catch me up', 'what have I been working on', 'where did I leave off', before start

• reflect

  Spawn three parallel review subagents over the active transcript, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.

• show-me-your-work

  Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or work a human review

• swarm

  Fan out N parallel workers, drain them, and return one report. Use for /swarm, 'swarm this', or parallel coverage, races, gauntlets, and exploration.

• tdd

  Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.

• teach

  Explain a body of work plainly so a person actually understands it. Runs the `how` and `why` skills and weaves what they find into one clear explanation. Use for 'teach me this', 'help me really understand X', 'explain this change or subsystem to me'.

• technical-writing

  Layered technical-writing standard: Diátaxis structure, Google developer style sentences, STE instruction rules, Global English syntax. Use for /technical-writing or when writing or reviewing docs, RFCs, readmes, PR descriptions, or commit messages.

• typescript-best-practices

  TypeScript best practices. Use when reading or editing any .ts or .tsx file.

• unslop

  Cut AI tells from any writing. Must always apply.

• why

  Use for 'why does X work this way', 'why we picked Y', design rationale, regressions, postmortems, or data-backed thresholds. Discovers available MCPs and queries each evidence category (source control, issue tracker, long-form docs, real-time chat, infrastructure observability, error tracking, prod

• comments-best-practices

  Guide for deciding when to keep, write, rewrite, or delete code comments and JSDoc. Use when

• d2-diagram

  Comprehensive tool for creating D2 diagrams based on descriptions and requirements. This skill should be used when creating visual diagrams, system architectures, flowcharts, network topologies, data flows, or any visual representation that can be expressed as a diagram. Triggers include requests to

• effect-best-practices

  Enforces Effect-TS patterns for services, errors, layers, and atoms. Use when writing code with Effect.Service, Schema.TaggedError, Layer composition, or effect-atom React components.

• effect-testing

  Comprehensive testing patterns for Effect-TS services, errors, layers, and effects. Use this skill when writing tests for Effect-based code.

• effect-ts

  This skill should be used when the user asks about Effect-TS patterns, services, layers, error handling, service composition, or writing/refactoring code that imports from 'effect'. Also covers Effect + Next.js integration with @prb/effect-next.

• agent-conv-cli

  Read your own local Claude Code / Codex CLI / Cursor conversation history

• coding-standards

  Correct-by-construction TypeScript standards. Use for TypeScript engineering or when another skill needs the user's coding standards.

• effect-service-design

  Design Effect services. Use when designing a new Effect service module or auditing an existing codebase for service, Layer, and composition improvements.

• effect

  Opinionated guide for building production TypeScript applications with Effect v4. Use when implementing Effect workflows, services, layers, schemas, configuration, schedules, caches, streams, HTTP clients, or tests.

• show-me

  Help the user understand the current topic visually with concise diagrams, code-shape sketches, and focused HTML artifacts.

• slack-user-cli

  Read and write Slack channels, DMs, threads, and search from the terminal

• tg-cli

  Read and send your own Telegram chats from the terminal via the bundled

• thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review

  Run an extremely strict maintainability review for abstraction quality, giant files, and spaghetti-condition growth. Use for a thermo-nuclear code quality review, thermonuclear review, deep code quality audit, or especially harsh maintainability review.

• github-issue

  Comprehensive GitHub issue lifecycle management from creation through resolution. Use when creating/viewing/editing/managing GitHub issues, writing issue descriptions, creating sub-issues, linking parent/child issues, dumping issue trees to markdown, or pushing issues from files. Covers the full iss

• linear-triage

  Linear project management for a product → design → engineering team. Use whenever the user mentions Linear or an issue identifier like TEAM-123 — shaping a project or writing its brief, writing or reviewing an issue, moving an issue between statuses or handing it to the next seat, auditing a board,

• maintainable-react

  Principles for writing, refactoring, and reviewing React code so it stays maintainable — resisting premature abstraction (the "demon component"), keeping data flow obvious, and putting state and effects in the right place. Use when writing or refactoring a React component or hook, deciding whether t

• pr-creator

  Guide PR authoring from creation through review completion. Use when creating/submitting/authoring pull requests, writing PR descriptions, responding to reviewer comments, or implementing review feedback. Covers the full PR lifecycle - creating PRs linked to issues, handling review comments (triagin

• pr-review

  Mechanics for leaving a pull request review on GitHub - CLI scripts for fetching PR data, attaching comments to the right file/line, wording/tone/severity conventions, and posting a batched review. Use when the user has feedback to leave on a PR and needs to know how to post it correctly.

• prd-authoring

  Guide for writing and reviewing clear, persuasive Product Requirements Documents (PRDs), including product proposals, feature proposals, and PRD feedback.

• react-best-practices
• sdk-documentation
• subgraph-skill
• tanstack-best-practices
• vocs-documentation

Similar plugins