specialists
claudeSpecialist agents for focused engineering advice and review.
18 agents
Read-only engineering audits with scoped evidence and findings.
Plugin audits from marketplace agent-workflows in nicolascava/agent-workflows. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 3 days ago.
code-quality-auditAssess code quality using Git, source inspection, and existing repository check results. Use for a full snapshot or an explicitly pinned change comparison.
codebase-reviewReview a repository across correctness, architecture, security, tests, and maintainability. Use for a broad codebase assessment beyond a single diff.
debt-auditAssess technical debt from verified repository evidence. Use to prioritize bounded maintenance work across architecture, dependencies, tests, delivery, and operations.
design-reviewAssess a requested interface or flow for hierarchy, usability, visual consistency, and accessibility evidence. Use with repository source and optional rendered or design references.
documentation-reviewReview repository documentation for accuracy, consistency, completeness, and usability. Use to compare written guidance with verified implementation and current repository policy.
domain-auditReview domain models, invariants, state transitions, and data integrity in a repository. Use to find evidenced logic defects and gaps in domain boundaries.
figma-reviewReview a user-supplied Figma file or node through an installed Figma MCP server. Use to assess design consistency and compare available repository implementation evidence.
frontend-reviewReview frontend source for component contracts, semantics, state handling, responsiveness, and performance risks. Use for a scoped UI code assessment with optional browser or Figma evidence.
security-auditReview repository security boundaries, code, configuration, and existing scanner evidence. Use for a scoped security assessment with verified findings and coverage limits.
soc2-readiness-auditAssess technical SOC 2 readiness against applicable trust services criteria using repository evidence. Use for control mapping and evidence gaps, not an attestation.
team-health-analysisAnalyze aggregate delivery and collaboration signals from Git and optional GitHub history of the current repository or explicitly named repositories. Use for evidence-based process questions with clear time windows and limits.
Specialist agents for focused engineering advice and review.
18 agents
Git workflows for branches, worktrees, and authorized change delivery.
10 skills · hooks
Engineering workflows for test-driven development, code review, and dependency updates.
9 skills · hooks
Issue workflows for planning, creation, and repository-bound tracking.
7 skills
Web interface design, visual review, and quality assurance workflows.
6 skills
Opt-in Codex CLI integration for engineering workflows.
1 skill
Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification
1 command · 6 agents
Design fluency for frontend development. 1 skill with 24 commands (/impeccable polish, /impeccable audit, /impeccable critique, etc.) and curated anti-pattern detection.
1 skill · 4 agents · hooks
Agentic QE (external: maintained in proffesor-for-testing/agentic-qe, pinned to v3.15.17): a quality-engineering fleet with 11 QE agents, 9 skills, 9 commands, the agentic-qe MCP server pinned to the plugin version, and the aqe-mod guard that refuses destructive operations on AQE learning data
9 skills · 9 commands · 11 agents · 1 MCP server
5 skills + 35 modes + Material Passport pipeline. Includes v3.6.7 cross-model audit gate and v3.6.8 generator-evaluator contract.
5 skills · 16 commands · 4 agents · hooks
Independent auditing for AI agents, open source. Claude discovers your setup, confirms the cost, and audits your agent against the one question other tools skip: is it doing the job it's supposed to do, given your business rules and org structure? Test any model (Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, Azure, Bedrock, …) graded by self, one independent judge, or a cross-vendor panel; each provider is billed to its own account via a key in your settings, never the command line. Results render as an interactive artifact (with a static-report fallback).
1 skill · hooks
Cedar policy enforcement + Ed25519 signed receipts for every Claude Code tool call. First cryptographic governance plugin — decisions are policy-gated before they run and every decision produces a tamper-evident receipt verifiable offline.
1 skill · 2 commands · 2 agents · hooks
This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.