academic-research-assistant-full

Plugin academic-research-assistant-full from marketplace academic-research-assistant in santanu-p/academic-research-assistant. Commands read from the repo's manifest — yesterday.

Skills (133)

• academic-research-assistant-full

  Use specialist academic research, evidence, writing, analysis and artifact workflows from a portable local bundle.

• research-assistant

  Use for academic, scientific and interdisciplinary research tasks, plugin onboarding, choosing capabilities, or coordinating literature, methods, analysis, writing, LaTeX, figures, presentations, integrity and publication workflows across the complete supplied collection.

• brief-expander

  Takes a minimal research idea (even one sentence) and expands it into a complete research brief that can drive the 10-skill pipeline. Performs web search, literature scanning, and field analysis to fill in problem statement, data assets, domain context, target venue, success criteria, comparators, a

• critic-revisor

  Autonomous adversarial critic-revisor loop on a LaTeX manuscript. Two parallel Opus reviews per round with differentiated angles (methodologist + applied/ contextual reader); reviewers can web-search within a per-round budget; Codex CLI applies the combined review; latexmk rebuilds the clean PDF; la

• house-style

  Exemplar-based house voice for LaTeX manuscripts: a reader-first standard judged against an approved exemplar, a house-voice rewrite that never changes meaning, numbers, citations, or defined terms, and advisory style metrics (sentence length, paragraph length, first-person plural, semicolons, numbe

• literature-lead
• methodology-architect

  Methodology reasoning agent. Reads literature deeply, identifies combinations of existing ideas that address gaps, assesses societal impact, and produces a methodology specification. Can be invoked standalone (pre-brief) or by write-paper/auto-research when methodology revision is needed. Usage: /me

• paper-critic
• paper-fixer
• paper-grader
• paper-modeler
• paper-writer
• research-pipeline
• validate-method
• write-manuscript
• academic-humanizer

  Improve the clarity and voice of AI-assisted academic writing (papers, theses, rebuttals) and funding proposals (NSF Project Summary/Description, NIH Specific Aims): preserve scholarly conventions, match claims to evidence (and, for proposals, claims to feasibility), and match the author's own voice

• academic-pptx

  Use this skill whenever the user wants to create or improve a presentation for an academic context — conference papers, seminar talks, thesis defenses, grant briefings, lab meetings, invited lectures, or any presentation where the audience will evaluate reasoning and evidence. Triggers include: 'con

• academic-humanizer

  Edit AI-assisted papers, theses, abstracts, rebuttals and funding proposals for clear scholarly author voice. Preserve technical meaning, numbers, equations and citations; match claims to evidence and proposal ambition to real feasibility. Keep general prose with humanizer.

• academic-pptx

  Plan and improve academic slide arguments, exhibits, citations, timing and Q&A; use the selected presentation backend for the requested file format.

• arms-brief-expander

  Expand a sparse research idea into a source-grounded problem brief with data, constraints, comparators, adjacent fields and evaluation criteria. Scope the problem before methodology design.

• arms-critic-revisor

  Run or plan the explicitly requested ARMS Bash critic-revisor loop for an existing LaTeX manuscript, using independent reviews, source verification, bounded revisions, builds and tracked changes. Requires configured external CLIs.

• arms-house-style

  Review or rewrite scholarly LaTeX prose to an author or paper exemplar using a reader-first paragraph audit, structural editing, advisory metrics and scientific-content integrity checks. Retain all claims and evidence.

• arms-literature-lead

  Coordinate ARMS post-validation literature work for manuscript positioning and related work: reuse Phase 1 extractions, fill coverage gaps, verify precedents and contradictions, and deliver a source-traceable writer briefing.

• arms-methodology-architect

  Design or rethink a research methodology from a concrete brief and original literature, using compatibility matrices, cross-field candidates, red-team checks, impact evidence and a testable mathematical specification. Do not implement or claim unvalidated results.

• arms-paper-critic

  Critique one ARMS deliverable without editing, returning at most five source-located correctness, evidence, completeness or clarity challenges. In Phase 3, respect frozen methodology and canonical audits; report missing shared-rubric limitations.

• arms-paper-fixer

  Apply concrete ARMS grade-report fixes to manuscript exposition, formula transcription, tables, citations and clarity while preserving validated code, evaluations, conclusions and adverse findings. Log research gaps instead of manufacturing new results.

• arms-paper-grader

  Grade a completed ARMS research manuscript with a seven-dimension advisory /50 rubric, independent computational audit, original-source contribution comparison and reader-first clarity review. Separate technical readiness, contribution and potential impact.

• arms-paper-modeler

  Execute ARMS post-validation production evaluations from frozen validated code, preserving method and parameters. Produce traceable CSVs and figures, reconcile formula-versus-code discrepancies into the canonical audit, and catalog anomalies for manuscript consumers.

• arms-paper-writer

  Draft one approved ARMS research-paper section in LaTeX from existing method, literature and current-run results. Preserve canonical reconciled equations, CSV provenance, comparator scope, adverse findings and author/exemplar voice.

• arms-research-pipeline

  Run or resume the complete ARMS pipeline for statistical methodology papers: scope, source-grounded design, executable validation, author-approved manuscript production and bounded grading/fixing. Enforce phase, contribution, synopsis and evidence gates with honest stop outcomes.

• arms-validate-method

  Implement and validate an ARMS methodology before drafting, using a declared empirical, analytical or synthesis track, faithful comparators, decisive checks, bounded diagnosis and saved evidence. Produce an honest GO/CONDITIONAL GO/MARGINAL/NO-GO recommendation.

• arms-write-manuscript

  Coordinate complete ARMS manuscript production after method validation and approval of the current synopsis: incremental positioning, frozen-code final evaluations, focused section drafting, critique, compilation and evidence-preserving final checks.

• evidence-citation-chaining

  Expand seed papers into a verified reading list using backward and forward citations, related-paper maps, influential authors and seminal versus recent work.

• evidence-citations-and-references

  Format supplied or verified references and in-text citations in major styles, or write evaluated annotated bibliographies.

• evidence-claim-checker

  Check a research claim or headline against its original study and wider evidence, giving a sourced verdict and an accurate replacement claim.

• evidence-compare-studies

  Compare studies in an aligned evidence table, explain agreement or disagreement, and weigh their conclusions by quality.

• evidence-data-extraction

  Extract reported study characteristics, findings and statistics into tables or CSV rows, preserving units and marking missing values.

• evidence-database-guide

  Rank databases, repositories and grey-literature sources for a specified field and evidence type, with access options and fit.

• evidence-debate-and-argument-evidence

  Prepare research-supported arguments and rebuttals for a debate or position paper, fairly presenting the strongest evidence and weaknesses on each side.

• evidence-decision-evidence

  Apply research, organizational information and stakeholder knowledge to a practical decision, with context fit, confidence and a measurable pilot.

• evidence-evidence-answer

  Answer what research says across verified sources, explaining effect magnitude, disagreements, limitations and evidence strength.

• evidence-evidence-based-writing

  Draft essays, articles or reports from supplied or verified studies using claim-evidence-explanation paragraphs and fair counterevidence.

• evidence-evidence-help

  Explain the evidence workflow's capabilities and give starter requests when the user asks for a menu or help getting started.

• evidence-evidence-meter

  Classify the studies actually reviewed for a yes/no research question and give a quality-weighted verdict, denominator and key papers.

• evidence-field-guides

  Select discipline-appropriate research designs, evidence standards and appraisal cautions when those standards change the research workflow.

• evidence-find-studies

  Find and verify research sources for a specific question, with bibliographic details, study type, sample, findings and usable links.

• evidence-literature-review

  Write literature reviews from supplied or verified sources using a synthesis matrix, critical comparisons and a gap-focused structure.

• evidence-meta-analysis

  Plan or interpret meta-analysis with compatible studies, effect measures, pooling models, heterogeneity, bias checks and sensitivity analyses.

• evidence-open-access-full-text

  Locate legal full-text access routes for a named paywalled paper, prioritizing repositories, author versions and library options.

• evidence-paper-summary

  Summarize a supplied or located paper's question, methods, numerical findings and limitations at brief or detailed depth, including which claims it supports.

• evidence-plain-language-research

  Explain research findings for a chosen audience in everyday language, preserving uncertainty, key numerical meaning and technical accuracy.

• evidence-research-evidence-finder

  Identify the appropriate evidence specialist for broad requests about research findings, studies or claims and begin that workflow.

• evidence-research-gaps

  Identify evidence-backed research gaps and turn them into source-located gap tables, questions, candidate designs and contribution statements. Distinguish supplied-corpus gaps from current literature confirmation.

• evidence-research-proposal-background

  Draft a proposal's evidence-backed background, problem and rationale from context through a knowledge gap to measurable study aims.

• evidence-research-question

  Turn an evidence-search topic into a PICO, PEO, SPIDER or PCC question with synonyms, scope variants and suggested eligibility limits.

• evidence-search-strings

  Build Boolean research queries for selected databases with synonyms, field tags, syntax limits, filters and too-many/too-few-result adjustments.

• evidence-source-verification

  Verify citation identity and DOI matches, then check retractions, corrections, venue reliability and peer-review status.

• evidence-statistics-explained

  Explain research statistics in plain language, emphasizing uncertainty, effect magnitude, absolute risk and common interpretation traps.

• evidence-study-appraisal

  Appraise a study's design, bias, measures, analysis and warranted conclusions using a design-appropriate risk-of-bias approach.

• evidence-study-designs-and-evidence-levels

  Explain what study designs can support and how certainty is judged for the research question, including design limitations and GRADE-style factors.

• evidence-systematic-review

  Plan, conduct or report systematic, scoping and rapid reviews with complete protocols, search and screening logs, extraction, appraisal, synthesis, certainty and PRISMA templates. Distinguish planned and executed work.

• guardrails-compag-elsevier-paper-editing

  Edit or audit scientific manuscript prose when Elsevier/COMPAG style is requested: concise evidence-driven logic, consistent terminology and tense, and the specified punctuation/emphasis rules. Preserve all frozen technical content and evaluation scope.

• guardrails-research-problem-mechanism-evidence

  Audit or develop scientific and technical arguments by connecting an observable problem, the exact mechanism changed, expected intermediate effects and evidence-bounded conclusions. Distinguish theory, implementation, ablation, comparison and diagnostics; preserve frozen content.

• latex-academic-poster

  Build large-format research posters in LaTeX using poster classes, readable type, columns and evidence blocks.

• latex-algorithms-code

  Typeset pseudocode and source listings in LaTeX.

• latex-beamer-slides

  Create or edit Beamer slide source with frames, overlays, blocks, notes and handouts when the requested presentation format is LaTeX.

• latex-bibliography-citations

  Create and repair LaTeX bibliographies and citation wiring in LaTeX.

• latex-books-notes

  Build books, lecture notes and cheat sheets in LaTeX in LaTeX.

• latex-certificates-flyers

  Lay out certificates, invitations, flyers and other designed pages in LaTeX.

• latex-cross-references-links

  Repair labels, links, contents, glossaries and indexes in LaTeX.

• latex-custom-macros

  Create semantic commands, environments, boxes, packages and classes in LaTeX.

• latex-document-builder

  Create a complete LaTeX document from a description, outline or supplied content, choosing a suitable class and minimal preamble.

• latex-equation-converter
• latex-error-fixer
• latex-figures-images
• latex-format-conversion
• latex-homework-exams
• latex-journal-templates
• latex-latex-cleanup
• latex-latex-help
• latex-latex-proofreading
• latex-latex-studio
• latex-letters
• latex-math-equations
• latex-multilingual-fonts
• latex-page-formatting
• latex-pgfplots-charts
• latex-reports-manuals
• latex-research-paper
• latex-resume-cv
• latex-science-notation
• latex-setup-compiling
• latex-tables
• latex-theorems-proofs
• latex-thesis-dissertation
• latex-tikz-diagrams
• scholar-abstract-introduction
• scholar-academic-editing
• scholar-academic-translation
• scholar-citation-generator
• scholar-data-analysis-plan
• scholar-evidence-synthesis
• scholar-find-sources
• scholar-grant-proposal
• scholar-journal-finder
• scholar-literature-review
• scholar-methodology-design
• scholar-originality-integrity
• scholar-outline-builder
• scholar-paper-breakdown
• scholar-paper-sections
• scholar-paperpal-tools
• scholar-paraphrase-summarize
• scholar-peer-review-critique
• scholar-qualitative-analysis
• scholar-research-communication
• scholar-research-ethics
• scholar-research-gaps
• scholar-research-planner
• scholar-research-proposal
• scholar-research-question
• scholar-results-interpreter
• scholar-reviewer-response
• scholar-scholar-help
• scholar-scholar-studio
• scholar-source-evaluation
• scholar-submission-checklist
• scholar-survey-design
• scholar-systematic-review
• scholar-theoretical-framework
• scholar-thesis-dissertation
• scholar-word-reduction
• visuals-scientific-visual-table-style

Subagents (8)

• README
• consistency-auditor
• evidence-librarian
• failure-diagnoser
• manuscript-editor
• methodologist
• reproducibility-reviewer
• venue-compliance-gate

MCP servers (1)

• academic-research-assistant-full

  runs: node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/server/mcp.mjs

Similar plugins