Evaluating AI-based selection tools against scientific, legal, and ethical standards (Uniform Guidelines, Title VII, APA Ethics Code), per Tippins, Oswald & McPhail (2021).
12 skills
Auditing AI/ML personnel assessments for fairness, bias, validity, and utility, using the 12-component psychological-audit framework of Landers & Behrend (2023), 'Auditing the AI Auditors.'
Plugin ai-personnel-assessment from marketplace io-skills in OpenMatter-Network/agent-io-skills. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 1 month ago.
ai-audit-meta-componentsUse when auditing the cross-cutting "meta" considerations of an AI/ML personnel assessment that apply across every other component — Components 10-12 of the Landers & Behrend (2023) framework: cultural context (power differentials, cross-cultural transfer, community participation), respect (conforma
ai-audit-planningUse when scoping or commissioning a psychological audit of an AI/ML personnel assessment — to define which claims the audit will evaluate (validity, utility, lack of bias), establish the auditor's stance and credibility (internal / external / independent), decide formative vs. summative timing and t
ai-audit-reportingUse when writing up and releasing the results of a psychological audit of an AI/ML personnel assessment — producing a precise, comprehensive technical report for testing professionals AND a layperson-friendly summary for those the predictions affect, establishing the auditor's standards and credibil
ai-claims-and-stakeholder-auditUse when auditing how an AI/ML personnel assessment is described and how it affects people — Components 7-9 (information & perceptions) of the Landers & Behrend (2023) framework. Covers first-party developer claims (do they honestly and transparently follow from the audit evidence?), second-party ef
ai-fairness-lensesUse FIRST when evaluating, auditing, or debating whether an AI/ML personnel assessment is "fair" or "unbiased" — to define and defend which meaning of fairness/bias applies before drawing conclusions. Covers the three lenses from Landers & Behrend (2023): individual attitudes (distributive/procedura
ai-input-data-and-design-auditUse when auditing the data and foundational design of an AI/ML personnel assessment — Components 1-2 of the Landers & Behrend (2023) framework. Covers input-data population, sampling, range restriction, and incumbent-vs-applicant generalizability; and model design: how the criterion ("ground truth")
ai-model-development-auditUse when auditing how an AI/ML personnel assessment was actually built once its design was set — Components 3-5 of the Landers & Behrend (2023) framework: model development (refinement and cross-validation strategy, documentation), model features (feature engineering — NLP tokens vs. topics, speech-
ai-model-outputs-auditUse when auditing the scores an AI/ML personnel assessment produces — Component 6 of the Landers & Behrend (2023) framework. Covers evaluating the quality of model predictions: reliability (consistency over time and repeated administrations), validity evidence (do scores reflect the claimed construc
Evaluating AI-based selection tools against scientific, legal, and ethical standards (Uniform Guidelines, Title VII, APA Ethics Code), per Tippins, Oswald & McPhail (2021).
12 skills
Validating and using personnel selection procedures, per the SIOP/APA Principles (5th ed., 2018): work analysis, criterion/content/internal-structure validity, generalization, fairness, scoring decisions, reporting, administration, accommodations.
11 skills
This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.