Sharper decisions with Claude: a five-advisor council, brutal assessment, premortem, red team, pressure test and a business-builder chain that counter Claude's agreeableness.
0 on GitHubby captKernelv1.0.0MITupdated 30 days ago
/
Plugin thinking-tools from marketplace thinking-tools in captkernel/claude-thinking-tools. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 27 days ago.
What it installs
Skills (6)
brutal
Use when the user wants a blunt, no-flattery assessment of an idea, plan, or draft. Triggers: \"be brutal\", \"no flattery\", \"give me your honest take\", \"tear this apart\".
business-builder
Use to take a business or product idea from concept to first customers via a guided prompt chain. Triggers: \"help me build a business\", \"turn this idea into an offer\", \"go from idea to customers\".
council
Convene a five-persona advisory council to adversarially pressure-test a decision and counter Claude's tendency to agree with the user. Use BEFORE any consequential or hard-to-reverse decision — a launch, a hire, a pivot, a big spend, a public commitment, an architecture choice, a contract — or any
premortem
Use to run a pre-mortem on a plan or decision: assume it failed and find the likely causes. Triggers: \"pre-mortem\", \"how could this fail\", \"what would kill this plan\".
pressure-test
Use to pressure-test a startup or product idea for fatal flaws, YC-partner style. Triggers: \"pressure-test my idea\", \"is this idea any good\", \"find the fatal flaws\", \"would a VC fund this\".
redteam
Use to adversarially attack a plan or argument from the outside. Triggers: \"red team this\", \"attack this plan\", \"what are the holes\", \"poke holes\".
Slash commands (4)
/thinking-tools:brutal
Blunt, no-flattery assessment — ends with the hardest truth you're avoiding
/thinking-tools:premortem
Assume it failed in 12 months — write the post-mortem and what to change now
/thinking-tools:pressure-test
Pressure-test a startup/product idea for fatal flaws, YC-partner style
/thinking-tools:redteam
Adversarial review — the 5 strongest attacks an informed critic would make
Convene a meeting of AI personas (Boss, Pusher, Rookie, Watcher, Cynic) to debate your question. 3 to 10 participants, mix teams (dev, design, product, business, life), add custom personas on the fly.
Direction, capital and attention allocation, cross-functional arbitration, strategy validation, and the method for structuring the organization itself.
52 specialist subagents for authorized penetration testing and red team engagements.
0xSteph/pentest-ai-agents 2,439
Maintain thinking-tools?
This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.