claude

decision-evaluation-framework

Apply 20+ classical decision-making frameworks (cost-benefit, pre-mortem, MCDA, decision tree, reversibility, regret minimization, OODA, Eisenhower, SWOT, second-order, opportunity cost, 10/10/10, inversion, base rates, Kepner-Tregoe, six hats, Cynefin, red-team, stakeholder map, time-horizon) to any major decision. Run frameworks individually or as parallel lens-bundles, synthesize cross-framework verdicts, and render the result as a Typst PDF for archival, sharing, or upload to Google Drive.

5 on GitHubby Daniel Rosehillv1.0.0MITupdated 6 months ago

Not in a marketplace yet, so it loads for one session with --plugin-dir.

Plugin decision-evaluation-framework in danielrosehill/Claude-Decision-Evaluation-Framework-Plugin. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 1 month ago.

What it installs

Skills (27)

  • analyze

    Orchestrator — analyze a decision through multiple frameworks in parallel. Reads a decision file, fans out to N framework subagents simultaneously (one per selected framework), each produces a structured analysis fragment, then synthesis aggregates the results. Use this when the user wants a multi-l

  • base-rates

    Apply Kahneman's outside view — define the reference class, look up the historical base rate, and benchmark the inside-view prediction against it. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • bundles

    List, create, edit, or delete named lens-bundles (saved framework groupings) used by /decision:analyze. Bundles let the user predefine "for career decisions, run these five frameworks" without typing the list each time.

  • cost-benefit

    Apply Cost-Benefit Analysis to a single decision — quantify costs and benefits per option over a stated time horizon, run sensitivity, and produce a 0-100 score. Use when the user wants just this one lens, or as a building block called by /decision:analyze.

  • cynefin

    Apply Snowden's Cynefin frame — classify the decision domain (Clear, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, Confused) and prescribe domain-appropriate action. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • decision-tree

    Build a decision tree with probabilities and payoffs, roll back expected values, and report EV and variance per option. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • eisenhower

    Classify decision items by urgency and importance on the 2x2 matrix and prescribe quadrant-appropriate action. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • export

    Export a rendered decision-analysis PDF — upload to Google Drive via the configured gws MCP server, copy to a chosen local path, or both. Run after /decision:render-pdf.

  • inversion

    Apply Munger's inversion — invert the goal, list failure paths, and design avoidance behaviours and tripwires. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • kepner-tregoe

    Apply Kepner-Tregoe Decision Analysis — define MUST objectives as knockout filters and weighted WANT objectives, then assess adverse consequences. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • mcda

    Apply weighted Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis — derive criteria, weight them, score each option, and compute weighted totals with sensitivity. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • new-decision

    Scaffold a new decision file with the canonical structure — title, context, options, constraints, stakeholders, timeline, open questions — ready to feed to /decision:analyze. Use this when the user describes a decision verbally rather than handing over an existing decision file.

  • onboard

    First-run onboarding for the decision-evaluation-framework plugin. Interview the user about output paths, preferred frameworks, default lens-bundles, and Google Drive export settings, then write the config to the plugin user-data directory. Run before first use of /decision:analyze.

  • ooda

    Apply Boyd's OODA loop — observe, orient, decide, act — emphasising fast iteration over deep deliberation. Best for fast-moving or adversarial decisions. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • opportunity-cost

    Surface the next-best foregone use of the resources committed by the decision, and benchmark against it. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • pre-mortem

    Apply Klein's Pre-Mortem to a single decision — imagine catastrophic failure 12 months out and work backwards to identify failure modes, early-warning signals, and mitigations. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • red-team

    Adopt a red-team / devil's-advocate stance against the leading option — steel-man the case against, surface hidden assumptions, identify disconfirming evidence. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • regret-minimization

    Apply Bezos's Regret Minimization — project to a long-horizon future self and ask which option will be most regretted if not taken. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • render-pdf

    Render a decision-analysis workspace into a polished Typst PDF — cover page, executive summary, decision context, per-framework sections, comparison table, and synthesis. Output goes to <workspace>/analysis.pdf. Run after /decision:synthesize.

  • reversibility

    Classify the decision as Type 1 (one-way door, hard to reverse) or Type 2 (two-way door) per Bezos, and prescribe deliberation depth accordingly. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • second-order

    Apply second-order thinking — past the immediate effect, ask 'and then what?' through second and third-order consequences and reactions. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • six-hats

    Apply de Bono's Six Thinking Hats — deliberately move through factual, emotional, cautious, optimistic, creative, and process modes. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • stakeholder-map

    Map stakeholders by interest and influence, predict positions, identify hidden veto holders, and design an engagement plan. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • swot

    Run a SWOT analysis on the decision — strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats — with cross-quadrant strategic moves. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • synthesize

    Read all per-framework analysis fragments in a decision workspace and produce a cross-framework synthesis — agreement/disagreement matrix, score table, weighted verdict, and the open questions any individual framework couldn't resolve. Run after /decision:analyze, or invoke directly to re-synthesize

  • ten-ten-ten

    Apply Suzy Welch's 10/10/10 — how will you feel about this decision in 10 minutes, 10 months, and 10 years. Debiases short-horizon thinking. Produces a 0-100 score.

  • time-horizon

    Stress-test the decision across now / near / medium / long time horizons and surface horizon conflicts. Produces a 0-100 score.

View source on GitHub

Similar plugins

AI-powered codebase understanding — analyze, visualize, and explain any project

9 skills · 10 agents · hooks

Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything 92,410

Test gap detection, coverage analysis, and automated test generation

3 skills · 1 command · 1 agent

ruvnet/ruflo 81,589

Reliable automation, in-depth debugging, and performance analysis in Chrome using Chrome DevTools and Puppeteer

8 skills · 1 MCP server

ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp 55,181

Perform AI code review on Git diffs — supports workspace changes, branch ranges, and single commits with concurrent per-file analysis, codebase search, and deep context-aware review.

2 commands

alibaba/open-code-review 50,068

gitnexus

claudecodex

Code intelligence powered by a knowledge graph. Provides execution flow tracing, blast radius analysis, and augmented search across your codebase.

12 skills · 1 MCP server · hooks

abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus 48,482

SAST analysis, dependency vulnerability scanning, OWASP Top 10 compliance, container security scanning, and automated security hardening

5 skills · 3 commands · 2 agents

wshobson/agents 42,461

Maintain decision-evaluation-framework?

This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.

claude & codex pluginslisted