baseline-planningPlan baseline measurement, or check a baseline's indicator coverage against the framework, covering timing, source comparability, permissions and gaps without inventing starting values or targets. Use when a program needs a baseline plan or a coverage check before data collection.
baseline-reportCheck a baseline report or study against the project's logframe and M&E plan in a project folder, for methodology consistency across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document baseline checks. To plan a baseline or check indicator coverage, use baseline-planning. To review a single baseline repo
data-quality-planningPlan a risk-based data quality assessment from supplied indicator, data-flow, risk, access and capacity information, with proposed checks, owners and timing. Use when a program needs a DQA plan. Does not claim completed verification.
data-qualityCheck an existing data quality assessment against the project's M&E plan and logframe in a project folder, for scope and VIPRT coverage across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document DQA checks. To plan a new DQA, use data-quality-planning. To review a single DQA report, use me-review data-qu
eval-reportCheck an evaluation report against its TOR and logframe in a project folder, for compliance across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document evaluation report checks. To turn findings into a management response, use findings-to-actions. To review a single report, use me-review evaluation-report
eval-torCheck an evaluation TOR against the logframe, M&E plan and baseline in a project folder, for alignment across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document TOR checks. To draft a new TOR, use evaluation-tor-draft. To review a single TOR, use me-review tor-review.
evaluation-questionsDraft or improve prioritized evaluation questions from supplied program and decision context. Use when a user needs questions for an evaluation, inception process, or evaluation TOR.
evaluation-tor-draftDraft an evaluation Terms of Reference from supplied program and evaluation materials. Use when a user needs a structured, evidence-linked TOR draft with gaps and feasibility issues made explicit.
findings-to-actionsConvert supplied evaluation or review findings into a traceable management response and action matrix. Use when evidence needs a proposed response, decision, or follow-up action.
indicator-reference-sheetsDraft or update indicator reference sheets from supplied indicator and program materials. Use when indicator definitions and collection procedures need a consistent editable record.
indicatorsCheck indicators against the logframe and M&E plan in a project folder, for consistent definitions across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document indicator checks. To draft reference sheets, use indicator-reference-sheets. To review indicator quality, use me-review indicator-quality.
logframeCheck a logframe against the proposal and theory of change in a project folder, for vertical and horizontal logic across documents. Use for folder-based logframe logic checks. For narrative and results-chain alignment across versions, use results-chain-alignment. To review a single logframe, use me-
me-plan-draftDraft an M&E or MEL plan from supplied program and indicator materials, or check an existing plan's coherence with its framework. Use when a program needs an operational monitoring, evaluation, learning and data-use plan.
me-planCheck an M&E plan against the logframe and proposal in a project folder, for coherence across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document M&E plan checks. To draft a new plan, use me-plan-draft. To review a single plan, use me-review me-plan-review.
measurement-feasibilityAssess whether proposed indicators and data collection plans are feasible with stated sources, staff, timing, and resources. Use when a measurement design may exceed available capacity.
progress-evidenceCheck progress-report evidence, indicator coverage, and period-to-period comparisons. Use when reported results need a traceable evidence review with gaps and supported trends identified.
progress-reportCheck progress reports from several periods against the logframe and M&E plan in a project folder, for data plausibility across reporting periods. Use for folder-based multi-period checks. For one report's evidence, coverage and trends, use progress-evidence. To review a single report, use me-review
project-auditM&E system audit specialist. Reads all project documents (logframe, M&E plan, indicators, TOR, reports) to perform a comprehensive cross-document consistency check and system health assessment.
proposalProposal file-integrated workflows. Cross-references proposal M&E section against RFP requirements and logframe to check compliance and alignment.
question-method-alignmentMap evaluation questions to evidence, indicators, sources, and feasible collection methods, including limitations. Use when an evaluation needs an evidence or methods matrix.
results-chain-alignmentCompare a theory of change, logframe, results framework, proposal or indicator register against each other for coverage, scope, indicator and causal-logic conflicts, preserving source versions and authority decisions. Use when results documents or their versions may disagree.
sampling-plan-draftDraft an M&E sampling plan, or check an existing one's sizing and selection, from purpose, population, frame and constraints, with transparent calculations and unresolved decisions. Use when a survey or evaluation needs a sample design.
sampling-planCheck a sampling methodology against the evaluation TOR and M&E plan in a project folder, for appropriateness across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document sampling checks. To draft a sampling plan or check its sizing, use sampling-plan-draft. To review a single sampling plan, use me-review
theory-of-changeCheck a theory of change against the logframe, M&E plan and proposal in a project folder, for causal logic across documents. Use for folder-based ToC checks. For ToC and logframe alignment across versions, use results-chain-alignment. To review a single ToC, use me-review theory-of-change-review.
baseline-report-reviewReview a baseline report, baseline study, baseline assessment, baseline survey, or pre-intervention measurement for indicator coverage, sampling methodology, disaggregation, measurement consistency, data quality, and target validation. Use when a user pastes, references, or asks about a baseline rep
data-quality-reviewReview a data quality assessment, DQA report, DQA plan, data quality audit, data verification report, or VIPRT assessment for scope adequacy, verification rigor, VIPRT coverage, systems assessment, and action plan quality. Use when a user pastes, references, or asks about a DQA, data quality assessm
evaluation-report-reviewReview an evaluation final report for structural completeness, finding quality, evidence anchoring, limitation awareness, recommendation specificity, and accessibility. Use when a user pastes, references, or asks about an evaluation report, final report, endline report, impact assessment, performanc
indicator-qualityReview M&E indicators, KPIs or performance metrics for definition, measurability, relevance, disaggregation, data burden and evidence gaps, using SMART and CREAM checks. Use when a user pastes, references or asks about indicators, indicator quality, SMART or CREAM criteria, KPIs, performance indicat
logframe-reviewReview a logframe or results framework for logic gaps, weak indicators, missing assumptions, and structural issues. Use when a user pastes, references, or asks about a logframe, log frame, LFA, logical framework, results framework, results chain, results matrix, performance framework, M&E framework,
me-plan-reviewReview an M&E, MEL or MEAL plan, performance management plan (PMP) or indicator framework for practical collection, roles, indicator definitions, resources, reporting and coherence. Use when a user pastes, references or asks about an M&E plan, MEL plan, MEAL plan, PMP, monitoring plan or indicator r
progress-report-reviewReview a progress, quarterly, semi-annual, annual or donor report for evidence coverage, arithmetic, period consistency, narrative-data alignment and supported conclusions. Use when a user pastes, references or asks about a progress report, quarterly report, annual report, APR, donor report or perfo
proposal-me-reviewReview the M&E section of a proposal, grant application, concept note, or project document for approach quality, results framework alignment, indicator selection, data collection methods, evaluation planning, data quality provisions, learning and adaptation, M&E budget, and M&E staffing. Use when a
sampling-plan-reviewReview a sampling plan, sampling strategy, sample size calculation, sampling methodology, or sampling frame for method appropriateness, sample size justification, frame quality, selection procedure, disaggregation feasibility, and practical feasibility. Use when a user pastes, references, or asks ab
survey-reviewReview a survey instrument, questionnaire, data collection tool, KII guide, or FGD guide for design quality, question clarity, ethical compliance, sampling adequacy, and practical feasibility. Use when a user pastes, references, or asks about a survey, questionnaire, data collection tool, data colle
theory-of-change-reviewReview a theory of change, ToC, causal pathway, results chain, impact pathway, change model, or program logic for logical coherence, assumption quality, evidence base, measurability, and scope clarity. Use when a user pastes, references, or asks about a theory of change, ToC, causal model, causal fr
tor-reviewReview an evaluation terms of reference (TOR), scope of work (SOW), commissioning brief or evaluation RFP for answerability, feasibility, ethics, team, budget and clear commissioning requirements. Use when a user pastes, references or asks about an evaluation TOR, terms of reference, SOW, evaluation