Monitoring and evaluation jobs on your project folder: twelve job skills (evaluation questions, question-method alignment, evaluation TOR drafts, indicator reference sheets, measurement feasibility, M&E plan drafts, progress evidence, findings to actions, results chain alignment, sampling plans, data quality assessment plans, baseline planning), three workflow packs and nineteen commands that cross-reference logframes, M&E plans, proposals, reports and TORs and write editable Markdown with source traceability.
Plugin me-workspace from marketplace sigistry in sigistry/marketplace. Commands read from the repo's manifest — yesterday.
baseline-planningPlan baseline measurement, or check a baseline's indicator coverage against the framework, covering timing, source comparability, permissions and gaps without inventing starting values or targets. Use when a program needs a baseline plan or a coverage check before data collection.
baseline-reportCheck a baseline report or study against the project's logframe and M&E plan in a project folder, for methodology consistency across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document baseline checks. To plan a baseline or check indicator coverage, use baseline-planning. To review a single baseline repo
data-quality-planningPlan a risk-based data quality assessment from supplied indicator, data-flow, risk, access and capacity information, with proposed checks, owners and timing. Use when a program needs a DQA plan. Does not claim completed verification.
data-qualityCheck an existing data quality assessment against the project's M&E plan and logframe in a project folder, for scope and VIPRT coverage across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document DQA checks. To plan a new DQA, use data-quality-planning. To review a single DQA report, use me-review data-qu
eval-reportCheck an evaluation report against its TOR and logframe in a project folder, for compliance across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document evaluation report checks. To turn findings into a management response, use findings-to-actions. To review a single report, use me-review evaluation-report
eval-torCheck an evaluation TOR against the logframe, M&E plan and baseline in a project folder, for alignment across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document TOR checks. To draft a new TOR, use evaluation-tor-draft. To review a single TOR, use me-review tor-review.
evaluation-questionsDraft or improve prioritized evaluation questions from supplied program and decision context. Use when a user needs questions for an evaluation, inception process, or evaluation TOR.
evaluation-tor-draftDraft an evaluation Terms of Reference from supplied program and evaluation materials. Use when a user needs a structured, evidence-linked TOR draft with gaps and feasibility issues made explicit.
findings-to-actionsConvert supplied evaluation or review findings into a traceable management response and action matrix. Use when evidence needs a proposed response, decision, or follow-up action.
indicator-reference-sheetsDraft or update indicator reference sheets from supplied indicator and program materials. Use when indicator definitions and collection procedures need a consistent editable record.
indicatorsCheck indicators against the logframe and M&E plan in a project folder, for consistent definitions across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document indicator checks. To draft reference sheets, use indicator-reference-sheets. To review indicator quality, use me-review indicator-quality.
logframeCheck a logframe against the proposal and theory of change in a project folder, for vertical and horizontal logic across documents. Use for folder-based logframe logic checks. For narrative and results-chain alignment across versions, use results-chain-alignment. To review a single logframe, use me-
me-plan-draftDraft an M&E or MEL plan from supplied program and indicator materials, or check an existing plan's coherence with its framework. Use when a program needs an operational monitoring, evaluation, learning and data-use plan.
me-planCheck an M&E plan against the logframe and proposal in a project folder, for coherence across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document M&E plan checks. To draft a new plan, use me-plan-draft. To review a single plan, use me-review me-plan-review.
measurement-feasibilityAssess whether proposed indicators and data collection plans are feasible with stated sources, staff, timing, and resources. Use when a measurement design may exceed available capacity.
progress-evidenceCheck progress-report evidence, indicator coverage, and period-to-period comparisons. Use when reported results need a traceable evidence review with gaps and supported trends identified.
progress-reportCheck progress reports from several periods against the logframe and M&E plan in a project folder, for data plausibility across reporting periods. Use for folder-based multi-period checks. For one report's evidence, coverage and trends, use progress-evidence. To review a single report, use me-review
project-auditM&E system audit specialist. Reads all project documents (logframe, M&E plan, indicators, TOR, reports) to perform a comprehensive cross-document consistency check and system health assessment.
proposalProposal file-integrated workflows. Cross-references proposal M&E section against RFP requirements and logframe to check compliance and alignment.
question-method-alignmentMap evaluation questions to evidence, indicators, sources, and feasible collection methods, including limitations. Use when an evaluation needs an evidence or methods matrix.
results-chain-alignmentCompare a theory of change, logframe, results framework, proposal or indicator register against each other for coverage, scope, indicator and causal-logic conflicts, preserving source versions and authority decisions. Use when results documents or their versions may disagree.
sampling-plan-draftDraft an M&E sampling plan, or check an existing one's sizing and selection, from purpose, population, frame and constraints, with transparent calculations and unresolved decisions. Use when a survey or evaluation needs a sample design.
sampling-planCheck a sampling methodology against the evaluation TOR and M&E plan in a project folder, for appropriateness across documents. Use for folder-based cross-document sampling checks. To draft a sampling plan or check its sizing, use sampling-plan-draft. To review a single sampling plan, use me-review
theory-of-changeCheck a theory of change against the logframe, M&E plan and proposal in a project folder, for causal logic across documents. Use for folder-based ToC checks. For ToC and logframe alignment across versions, use results-chain-alignment. To review a single ToC, use me-review theory-of-change-review.
/me-workspace:baseline-report--check-indicator-coverageUse the maintained baseline-planning method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:baseline-report--create-planUse the maintained baseline-planning method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:data-quality--create-dqa-planUse the maintained data-quality-planning method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:eval-report--check-tor-complianceCheck whether an evaluation report answers all TOR questions, follows the required methodology, and delivers all required outputs
/me-workspace:eval-report--create-responseUse the maintained findings-to-actions method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:eval-tor--check-alignmentCheck whether evaluation TOR questions align with the logframe indicators and M&E plan data collection
/me-workspace:eval-tor--createUse the maintained evaluation-tor-draft method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:indicators--create-irsUse the maintained indicator-reference-sheets method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:logframe--check-narrativeUse the maintained results-chain-alignment method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:me-plan--check-coherenceUse the maintained me-plan-draft method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:me-plan--createUse the maintained me-plan-draft method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:progress-report--check-coverageUse the maintained progress-evidence method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:progress-report--check-trendsUse the maintained progress-evidence method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:project-audit--full-checkRun a comprehensive audit of the entire M&E document system checking coherence, consistency, and gaps across all project documents
/me-workspace:proposal--check-rfpCheck whether a proposal responds to all requirements in an RFP, with focus on M&E requirements
/me-workspace:sampling-plan--check-methodologyUse the maintained sampling-plan-draft method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:sampling-plan--createUse the maintained sampling-plan-draft method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:theory-of-change--check-logframe-alignmentUse the maintained results-chain-alignment method for this M&E job on supplied project files.
/me-workspace:theory-of-change--createGenerate a structured Theory of Change from project documents with causal pathway validation and weighted QCM quality gates
Twelve structured monitoring and evaluation document reviews: logframes, theories of change, indicators, evaluation TORs, M&E plans, proposals, sampling plans, surveys, baseline reports, progress reports, data quality assessments, and evaluation reports. Each returns section-by-section PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL ratings, a summary verdict, and prioritized recommendations.
36 skills
Builds up to a goal in a field you have no expertise in: splits it into the foundations that goal actually needs, mobilizes what you already hold, learns what is missing, and leaves every solved path behind for the next goal. Nothing is called done until a check passes.
16 skills · hooks
Triages failing GitHub Actions runs, hardens Dockerfiles, pre-flights Kubernetes manifests before they reach the cluster, and drafts blameless postmortems from incident evidence
4 skills · 5 commands · 3 agents · hooks
Goes past detecting accessibility and localization issues to fixing them: cross-element ARIA and keyboard-focus remediation, color-contrast rewrites, hardcoded-string extraction, ICU MessageFormat correctness, and RTL readiness
3 skills · 5 commands · 2 agents · hooks
A repo-native toolchain for LLM apps: scaffolds eval suites, red-teams for prompt injection, hardens structured-output reliability, and audits token cost, riding promptfoo/DeepEval/Pydantic rather than replacing them
4 skills · 4 commands · 2 agents · hooks
Owns everything around the diff: craft Conventional Commits and PR descriptions, recommend the right semver bump by reasoning about behavioral breaking changes, assemble changelogs from messy history, and guide merge-conflict resolution, rebase planning, and git-history archaeology
2 skills · 5 commands · 3 agents · hooks
AI-powered codebase understanding — analyze, visualize, and explain any project
9 skills · 10 agents · hooks
Open-source AI job search that runs locally in your AI coding CLI: scan job portals, evaluate listings into a structured A-H report with a 1-5 score, tailor your CV, track applications
5 skills · hooks
Test gap detection, coverage analysis, and automated test generation
3 skills · 1 command · 1 agent
5 skills + 35 modes + Material Passport pipeline. Includes v3.6.7 cross-model audit gate and v3.6.8 generator-evaluator contract.
5 skills · 16 commands · 4 agents · hooks
Reliable automation, in-depth debugging, and performance analysis in Chrome using Chrome DevTools and Puppeteer
8 skills · 1 MCP server
Perform AI code review on Git diffs — supports workspace changes, branch ranges, and single commits with concurrent per-file analysis, codebase search, and deep context-aware review.
2 commands
This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.