claude

code

Code quality spice for Line Cook — decision frameworks, antipattern detection, refactoring patterns, tradeoff analysis, YAGNI guidance, dead code pruning, and plan auditing

0 on GitHubby smileynetv0.3.0MITupdated 8 months ago

Not in a marketplace yet, so it loads for one session with --plugin-dir.

Plugin code in smileynet/code-spice. Commands read from the repo's manifest — 1 month ago.

What it installs

Skills (13)

  • code-antipatterns

    Antipattern catalog with categorized patterns, symptoms, examples, and fixes. Use when reviewing code for quality issues, detecting bad patterns during plan-audit or scope, evaluating whether a pattern is an antipattern or acceptable tradeoff, or fixing existing code smells. Covers surprise, misuse,

  • code-naming

    Naming decisions for variables, functions, classes, constants, and APIs. Use when choosing names, reviewing naming quality, refactoring unclear names, or establishing naming conventions. Covers descriptive naming, naming as documentation, language-specific conventions, and common naming antipatterns

  • code-plan-audit

    Plan quality auditing with completeness scorecard, antipattern risk detection, and readiness checks. Use when auditing implementation plans, evaluating plan completeness, checking error handling strategy, assessing naming and readability pre-checks, reviewing testing strategy, evaluating tradeoff do

  • code-pruning

    Dead code detection strategies, safe removal processes, dependency pruning, and bloat metrics for systematically reducing codebase dead weight. Use when evaluating codebase health during architecture-audit, performing cleanup during cook, reviewing unused dependencies, removing commented-out code, o

  • code-quality-foundations

    Code quality pillars, goals, abstraction layers, and tradeoff thinking. Use when evaluating code quality, setting quality goals, choosing abstraction levels, making design tradeoffs, or auditing code against quality pillars. Covers readability, modularity, testability, reusability, and the principle

  • code-readability

    Code readability patterns covering comments, function decomposition, nesting, naming conventions, and code structure. Use when evaluating whether code is easy to understand, deciding when and how to write comments, decomposing functions, reducing nesting depth, improving code structure, or reviewing

  • code-review

    Code review process, effective feedback, PR best practices, team working agreements, review automation, AI-augmented review, and review antipatterns. Use when reviewing code, preparing PRs, giving review feedback, setting up review processes, writing review comments, or conducting code reviews durin

  • code-scope-boundaries

    Project-level scope analysis for evaluating whether a project has exceeded its useful boundaries, needs splitting, or is experiencing scope creep. Use when evaluating project structure, considering whether to split a project, assessing feature belonging, or when projects feel too large or unfocused

  • code-testing-quality

    Unit testing principles, test structure patterns, test doubles strategy, naming conventions, testing antipatterns, and coverage guidance. Use when writing tests, reviewing test quality, evaluating test coverage, choosing test doubles, fixing flaky tests, or assessing test structure during cook and s

  • code-yagni

    YAGNI decision frameworks for evaluating whether to build a feature, detecting speculative generality, and preventing unnecessary feature bloat. Use when planning involves new features, design decisions, or "should we build this" questions during brainstorm, scope, or architecture review. Covers fou

  • error-handling-patterns

    Error handling strategy selection, recoverability analysis, and signaling techniques. Use when choosing between exceptions, result types, error codes, or other error handling approaches, designing error-handling APIs, wrapping third-party library errors, or evaluating whether errors should be explic

  • refactoring-patterns

    Refactoring patterns, techniques, and decision frameworks. Use when improving existing code structure, reducing complexity, eliminating code smells, choosing between refactoring approaches, or deciding when refactoring is worthwhile. Covers extraction, encapsulation, type-based refactoring, strategy

  • software-tradeoffs

    Software tradeoff analysis, decision frameworks, and common tradeoff patterns. Use when evaluating design alternatives, choosing between competing approaches, analyzing costs vs. benefits of technical decisions, or when a decision involves tension between two desirable properties. Covers duplication

Slash commands (4)

  • /code:prune

    Interactive codebase pruning analysis — dead code, unused dependencies, speculative abstractions, scope boundaries, and prioritized removal plan

  • /code:review-prep

    Generate a context-aware self-review checklist before code review

  • /code:smell

    Structured code smell detection on recent changes

  • /code:tradeoff

    Systematic tradeoff analysis for design decisions

Subagents (1)

  • code-quality-critic

    Reviews code quality using pillar-based criteria — readability, naming, error handling, antipatterns, and testability. Use during serve phase for enhanced quality feedback beyond structural review.

View source on GitHub

Similar plugins

Active coding discipline enforcer based on Karpathy's 4 principles: surface assumptions, simplify, make surgical changes, define verifiable goals. Ships 4 Python tools (complexity_checker, diff_surgeon, assumption_linter, goal_verifier), a review agent, /karpathy-check command, and pre-commit hook. All stdlib-only.

1 skill · 1 command · 1 agent

alirezarezvani/claude-skills 29,725

slopmop

claude

Quality gates for AI-assisted codebases. Provides refit onboarding, the swab/scour/buff/sail remediation loop, and barnacle friction reporting as a Claude skill and slash commands.

1 skill · 6 commands

davepoon/buildwithclaude 3,741

sentrux

claude

MCP server for structural health analysis — 14 dimensions graded A-F, dependency cycles, coupling, dead code, test coverage, and quality gates

1 skill · 1 MCP server

sentrux/sentrux 3,342

wps

claude

Write code that passes wemake-python-styleguide

1 skill

wemake-services/wemake-python-styleguide 2,948

Multi-agent orchestration system with 51 specialized agents for development workflows, code quality, deployment, research, games, and more. Includes orchestrators for checkpoint, deploy, quality, fullstack, research, games, corpus, web, and python workflows.

51 agents

jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace 2,917

Code quality and software design skills including Clean Code (Robert C. Martin), Refactoring patterns (Martin Fowler), A Philosophy of Software Design (John Ousterhout), The Pragmatic Programmer (Hunt & Thomas), Domain-Driven Design (Eric Evans), Working Effectively with Legacy Code (Michael Feathers), and Google's Developer Documentation Style Guide (technical-documentation)

65 skills

wondelai/skills 2,680

Maintain code?

This page updates itself from your repo. Add the badge to your README, or get it Featured to pin it above the organic results with a followed link to your site.

claude & codex pluginslisted