deliberation:clearnessConvenes a clearness committee of specialized perspectives to examine a question with distributed depth rather than single-context breadth. Use when a topic spans multiple domains and deserves thorough parallel analysis — complex code reviews, architecture decisions, or multi-dimensional research.
deliberationStructured deliberation support for decisions worth sitting with — ethical questions, architecture choices, trade-offs, decisions where the user wants clarity rather than a handed-down conclusion. Use when a question deserves genuine discernment; may involve clearness, discernment, or gathered depen
deliberation:discernmentRuns structured internal deliberation before answering, surfacing multiple perspectives and naming tensions rather than jumping to a single conclusion. Use when a question carries ethical weight, has multiple valid approaches, involves significant trade-offs, or risks harm.
deliberation:gatheredFacilitates participatory discernment where the user contributes their own voice alongside agent perspectives, finding clarity together rather than receiving analysis. Use when the user has a stake or position in a decision and wants to participate — signaled by phrases like "I'm torn," "I've been t